Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18254086›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2008

Specialist breast care nurses for supportive care of women with breast cancer.

S Cruickshank, C Kennedy, K Lockhart, I Dosser, L Dallas

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Specialist breast care nurses for support of women with breast cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Validation of cost-effective model for breast self-examination.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Feasibility of a quality improvement strategy integrating psychosocial care into 28 medical cancer centers (HuCare project).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  14. Geographical comparisons of information and support needs of Australian women following the primary treatment of breast cancer: a 10-year replication study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Nurse-led follow-up care for cancer patients: what is known and what is needed.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S CruickshankNapier University, School of Acute and Continuing Care Nursing, Canaan Lane Campus, 74 Canaan Lane, Edinburgh, Lothian, UK, EH9 2TB. S.Cruickshank@napier.ac.uk
C Kennedy
K Lockhart
I Dosser
L Dallas

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast Care Nurses (BCNs) are now established internationally, predominantly in well resourced healthcare systems. The role of BCNs has expanded to reflect the diversity of the population in which they work, and the improvements in survival of women with breast cancer. Interventions by BCNs aim to support women and help them cope with the impact of the disease on their quality of life.

objectivesTo assess the effectiveness of individual interventions carried out by BCN's on quality of life outcomes for women with breast cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group Specialised Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (15 January 2007). We also searched MEDLINE (1966 to September 2006), CINAHL (1982 to September 2006), EMBASE (1980 to September 2006), British Nursing Index (1984 to September 2006), CancerLit (1961 to September 2006), PsycInfo (1967 to September 2006), Library and Info Science Abstracts (LISA) (1969 to September 2006), Dissertation Abstracts International (only available 2005 to September 2006). We contacted authors as appropriate. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials assessing the effects of interventions carried out by BCN's on quality of life outcomes, for women with breast cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed relevant studies for inclusion and undertook data extraction and quality assessment of included studies. MAIN

resultsWe incuded five studies, categorised into three groups. Three studies assessing psychosocial nursing interventions around diagnosis and early treatment found that the BCN could affect some components of quality of life, such as anxiety and early recognition of depressive symptoms. However, their impact on social and functional aspects of the disease trajectory was inconclusive. Supportive care interventions during radiotherapy was assessed by one study which showed that specific BCN interventions can alleviate perceived distress during radiotherapy treatment, but did not improve coping skills, mood or overall quality of life. One study assessed nurse-led follow-up interventions in which no statistically significant difference was identified for main demographic variables, satisfaction with care, access to medical care or anxiety and depression. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is limited evidence at this time to support the contention that interventions by BCNs assist in the short-term with the recognition and management of psychological distress for women with breast cancer. Further research is required before the impact of BCNs on aspects of quality of life for women with breast cancer can be known.

Indexed as

Oncology NursingQuality of LifeAnxietyBreast NeoplasmsDepressionFemaleHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.