Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18254018›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2008

Etidronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women.

G A Wells, A Cranney, J Peterson, M Boucher, B Shea, V Robinson, D Coyle, P Tugwell

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
35.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 500 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Exercise for improving outcomes after osteoporotic vertebral fracture.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Effectiveness of anti-osteoporotic drugs to prevent secondary fragility fractures: systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. The efficacy of conservative treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures on acute pain relief: a systematic review with meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2015
    Pooled it
  8. Comparative gastrointestinal safety of bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis: a network meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2014
    Pooled it
  9. Chinese herbal medicines for treating osteoporosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  10. Exercise for improving outcomes after osteoporotic vertebral fracture.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Bisphosphonates for osteoporosis in primary biliary cirrhosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  14. Exercise for preventing and treating osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Adherence, preference, and satisfaction of postmenopausal women taking denosumab or alendronate.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2011
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Appropriate osteoporosis treatment by family physicians in response to FRAX vs CAROC reporting: results from a randomized controlled trial.Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry
    Trial
  19. Article
  20. Osteoporosis medication use over time in the United States and Canada.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

G A WellsUniversity of Ottawa Heart Institute, Cardiovascular Research Reference Centre, Room H1-1, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1Y 4W7. gawells@ottawaheart.ca
A Cranney
J Peterson
M Boucher
B Shea
V Robinson
D Coyle
P Tugwell
Ottawa Hospital · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CACanadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteoporosis is an abnormal reduction in bone mass and bone deterioration leading to increased fracture risk. Etidronate belongs to the bisphosphonate class of drugs which act to inhibit bone resorption by interfering with the activity of osteoclasts.

objectivesTo assess the efficacy of etidronate in the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE for relevant randomized controlled trials published between 1966 to 2007. SELECTION CRITERIA: Women receiving at least one year of etidronate for postmenopausal osteoporosis were compared to those receiving placebo and/or concurrent calcium/vitamin D. The outcome was fracture incidence. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Study selection and data abstraction was done in duplicate. Meta-analysis of fracture outcomes was performed with data presented as relative risks and a relative change greater than 15% was considered clinically important. Study quality was assessed through the reporting of allocation concealment, blinding and withdrawals. MAIN

resultsEleven studies representing a total of 1248 patients were included in the review.A significant 41% relative risk reduction (RRR) in vertebral fractures across eight studies (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.96) was found. The six secondary prevention trials demonstrated a significant RRR of 47% in vertebral fractures (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.87) and a 5% absolute risk reduction (ARR); compared with the pooled result for the two primary prevention trials (RR 3.03, 95% CI 0.32 to 28.44), which was not significant. There were no statistically significant risk reductions for non-vertebral (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.42), hip (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.37 to 3.88) or wrist fractures (RR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.32 to 2.36). For adverse events, no statistically significant differences were found in the included studies. However, observational data has led to concerns regarding potential risk for upper gastrointestinal injury. AUTHORS'

conclusionsEtidronate, at 400 mg per day, demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically important benefit in the secondary prevention of vertebral fractures. No statistically significant reductions in vertebral fractures were observed when it was used for primary prevention. In addition, no statistically significant reductions in non-vertebral, hip, or wrist fractures were found, regardless of whether etidronate was used for primary or secondary prevention. The level of evidence for all outcomes is Silver (www.cochranemsk.org.).

Indexed as

Bone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsEtidronic AcidFemaleHip FracturesHumansOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalSpinal FracturesWrist InjuriesBone Density Conservation AgentsEtidronic Acid

Identifiers

PMID18254018
PMCPMC6999803
OpenAlexW2120433336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.