SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2008
Interventions for relieving the pain and discomfort of screening mammography.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04009278 (Self-compression Mammography in Clinical Practice), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Self-compression Mammography in Clinical Practice: A Randomized Clinical Trial Compared to Standard Compression Mammography
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigation of the effectiveness of cooling spray on mammography comfort.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial on the use of paracetamol for performing mammography.Medicine · 2018Trial
- Comparison of a flexible versus a rigid breast compression paddle: pain experience, projected breast area, radiation dose and technical image quality.European radiology · 2015Trial
- Automated Software Evaluation in Screening Mammography: A Scoping Review of Image Quality and Technique Assessment.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Understanding barriers to breast screening: an online survey of non-attenders as part of a service evaluation in the breast screening programme in England.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Characterization of a new radiochromic film (LD-V1) using mammographic beam qualities.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2025Article
- Breathomics: A Non-Invasive Approach for the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Dedicated breast CT: state of the art-Part I. Historical evolution and technical aspects.European radiology · 2022Review
- Influence of Discomfort Tolerance of Women who Undergo Mammography on the Perceived Pain Intensity Due to the Procedure.European journal of breast health · 2021Article
- Evaluation of pressure-controlled mammography compression paddles with respect to force-controlled compression paddles in clinical practice.European radiology · 2019Article
- The impact of regional screening policies on the diffusion of cancer screening participation in Belgium: time trends in educational inequalities in Flanders and Wallonia.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- Lifetime utilization of mammography among Maltese women: a cross-sectional survey.BMC public health · 2018Article
- Client and practitioner perspectives on the screening mammography experience.European journal of cancer care · 2017Article
- Patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imaging.International journal of women's health · 2017Article
- Mammography in females with an implanted medical device: impact on image quality, pain and anxiety.The British journal of radiology · 2016Article
- Effects of Reduced Compression in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Pain, Anxiety, and Image Quality.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2015Article
- Age differences in mammography screening reconsidered: life course trajectories in 13 European countries.European journal of public health · 2015Article
- Pain-preventing strategies in mammography: an observational study of simultaneously recorded pain and breast mechanics throughout the entire breast compression cycle.BMC women's health · 2015Observational
- Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer control strategies in Central America: the cases of Costa Rica and Mexico.PloS one · 2014Article
- Patient Barriers to Mammography Identified During a Reminder Program.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe pain of mammography is recognised as a significant deterrent for women considering this examination, and may affect participation in breast screening.
objectivesTo review interventions to reduce or relieve the pain and discomfort of screening mammography. SEARCH STRATEGY: For this update, the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group Specialised Register was searched on the 18th May 2006. Other databases searched were MEDLINE (1966 to November 2006), CINAHL (1982 to December 2006), EMBASE (1988 to 2006) and reference lists of articles. We also searched Current Controlled Trials (www.controlled-trials.com, accessed September 2007) and the UK National Research Register (www.update-software.com/national/, accessed September 2007) for ongoing and completed research projects. Researchers in the field were also contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials with a comparison group were considered. Studies had to include assessment of pain or discomfort and, if the intervention could have impacted on the quality of the mammograms, an assessment of image quality was also required. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors (DM and VL) reviewed identified studies to determine whether they met the inclusion criteria. Each study was reviewed for quality, including concealment and generation of allocation sequence, comparability between groups at baseline, inclusion of all randomised participants in analysis and blinding after allocation. Data extraction was performed by these two authors. MAIN
resultsSeven RCTs, involving 1671 women were identified for inclusion. The review found that giving women information about the procedure prior to the mammogram may reduce pain and discomfort. Increasing women's control over breast compression could reduce pain experienced during the procedure, though mammogram image quality was only maintained if the technologist controlled the first compression. If the technologist reduced compression force of the mammogram, discomfort experienced was unchanged. The use of breast cushions reduced pain of mammography; however, image quality was impaired in 2% of women in the intervention group. Acetoaminophen as a premedication did not affect discomfort of mammography. Differences in interventions, and inconsistency in measures, validation of pain scales, and in assessment of mammogram quality, mean that results of these studies cannot be combined. All results are based on single studies. Further research is required. AUTHORS'
conclusionsCurrently there are very few proven interventions to reduce pain and discomfort of screening mammography, especially procedures that can be readily introduced to screening programmes. With mammography continuing as the preferred method for breast screening, more research on such interventions is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.