SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2008
Physical training for cystic fibrosis.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 148 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physical activity and exercise training in cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Physical exercise training for cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Interventions for promoting physical activity in people with cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Effects of Exercise Intervention Program on Bone Mineral Accretion in Children and Adolescents with Cystic Fibrosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2019Trial
- The Sickle Cell Pro-Inflammatory Response to Interval Testing Study (SPRINTS) in children and young adults with sickle cell anemia - Study design and methodological strategies.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2020Article
- Hot topics and current controversies in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2019Review
- Article
- Physiotherapy for cystic fibrosis in Australia and New Zealand: A clinical practice guideline.Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2016Article
- European Cystic Fibrosis Society Standards of Care: Framework for the Cystic Fibrosis Centre.Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2014Review
- Infection, inflammation and exercise in cystic fibrosis.Respiratory research · 2013Review
- Exercise testing in cystic fibrosis: why (and how)?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2011Article
- Exercise training in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis: theory into practice.International journal of pediatrics · 2010Article
- Article
- [Pulmonary Rehabilitation: From Theory to Practice].Open respiratory archivesReview
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhysical training may form an important part of the care package for people with cystic fibrosis.
objectivesTo determine whether a prescribed regimen of physical training produces improvement or prevents deterioration in physiological and clinical outcomes in cystic fibrosis compared to no training. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. Date of the most recent search: September 2007. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised and quasi-randomised controlled clinical trials in which a prescribed regimen of physical training is compared to no physical training in people with cystic fibrosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently selected studies for inclusion, assessed methodological quality and extracted data. MAIN
resultsOf the 26 studies identified, seven studies which included 231 participants, met the inclusion criteria. This review does provide some limited evidence from both short- and long-term studies that aerobic or anaerobic physical training has a positive effect on primary outcomes (exercise capacity, strength and lung function) but improvements are not consistent between studies. AUTHORS'
conclusionsConclusions about the efficacy of physical training in cystic fibrosis are limited by the small size, short duration and incomplete reporting of most of the studies included in this review. Physical training is already part of the care package offered to most people with cystic fibrosis and there is a lack of evidence to actively discourage this. The benefits obtained from including physical training in a package of care may be influenced by the type of training programme. Further research is needed to assess comprehensively the benefits of exercise programmes in people with cystic fibrosis and the relative benefits of the addition of aerobic versus anaerobic versus a combination of both types of physical training to the care of people with cystic fibrosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.