Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18253996›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2008

Over-the-counter medications for acute cough in children and adults in ambulatory settings.

S M Smith, K Schroeder, T Fahey

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01356693 (Randomized,Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of the Phytotherapic Compound "Bromelin" on Acute Irritative Cough), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01356693 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

Randomized,Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of the Phytotherapic Compound "Bromelin" on Acute Irritative Cough

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Federal de PernambucoRan2011 to 2012Enrolled102ConditionsCough, AcuteArmsBromelin, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Use of specific neuromodulators in the treatment of chronic, idiopathic cough: a systematic review.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Honey for acute cough in children.Paediatrics & child health · 2016
    Article
  12. Pediatrician's cough and cold medication prescription for hypothetical cases - A cross-sectional multi-centric study.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Medication use in European primary care patients with lower respiratory tract infection: an observational study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Observational
  15. [Upper airway infections].Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Kinderheilkunde · 2014
    Article
  16. Does honey improve cough symptoms in children with upper respiratory tract infections?Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Complementary and integrative treatments: upper respiratory infection.Otolaryngologic clinics of North America · 2013
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Are drug combinations safe in the pediatric practice?Indian journal of pediatrics · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

S M Smith
K Schroeder
T Fahey
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IETrinity College · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute cough due to upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) is a common symptom. Non-prescription over-the-counter (OTC) medicines are frequently recommended as a first-line treatment, but there is little evidence as to whether these drugs are effective.

objectivesTo assess the effects of oral OTC cough preparations for acute cough. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2006, Issue 4); MEDLINE (January 1966 to January Week 1, 2007); EMBASE (January 1974 to January 2007); and the UK Department of Health National Research Register (June 2007). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing oral OTC cough preparations with placebo in children and adults suffering from acute cough in ambulatory settings. We considered all cough outcomes and second outcomes of interest were adverse effects. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened potentially relevant citations and independently extracted data and assessed study quality. Quantitative analysis was performed where appropriate. MAIN

resultsTwenty five trials (17 in adults, 8 in children) involving 3492 people (2876 adults and 616 children) were included. RESULTS OF STUDIES IN ADULTS: Six trials compared antitussives with placebo and had variable results. Two trials compared the expectorant, guaifenesin with placebo, one indicated significant benefit whereas the other did not. One trial found that a mucolytic reduced cough frequency and symptom scores. Two studies examined antihistamine-decongestant combinations and found conflicting results. Three studies compared other combinations of drugs with placebo and indicated some benefit in reducing cough symptoms. Three trials found antihistamines were no more effective than placebo in relieving cough symptoms. RESULTS OF STUDIES IN CHILDREN: Antitussives (two studies), antihistamines (two studies), antihistamine decongestants (two studies) and antitussive/bronchodilator combinations (one study) were no more effective than placebo. No studies using expectorants met our inclusion criteria. The results of one trial favoured active treatment with mucolytics over placebo. One trial tested two paediatric cough syrups and both preparations showed a 'satisfactory response' in 46% and 56% of children compared to 21% of children in the placebo group. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is no good evidence for or against the effectiveness of OTC medicines in acute cough. The results of this review have to be interpreted with caution due differences in study characteristics and quality. Studies often showed conflicting results with uncertainty regarding clinical relevance. Higher quality evidence is needed to determine the effectiveness of self-care treatments for acute cough.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdministration, OralAdultAmbulatory CareAntitussive AgentsChildCoughDrug Therapy, CombinationExpectorantsHistamine H1 AntagonistsHumansNonprescription DrugsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntitussive AgentsExpectorantsHistamine H1 AntagonistsNonprescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID18253996
OpenAlexW4254910144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.