Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18253986›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2008

Therapeutic ultrasound for venous leg ulcers.

D Al-Kurdi, S E M Bell-Syer, K Flemming

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Therapeutic ultrasound for venous leg ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Foam dressings for venous leg ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. [Physical treatment modalities for chronic leg ulcers].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2010
    Review
  8. What Does the Cochrane Collaboration Say about Therapeutic Ultrasound?Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2010
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Future treatment options for chronic wounds].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2008
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D Al-KurdiUniversity of York, Cochrane Wounds Group, Area 2 Seebohm Rowntree Building, York, North Yorkshire, UK YO10 5DD. dak502@york.ac.uk
S E M Bell-Syer
K Flemming
University of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVenous leg ulceration is a common problem, representing a significant burden on the patient and the healthcare system. They are caused by venous insufficiency and tend to be chronic and recurring. Management usually includes use of wound dressings plus compression stockings or bandages. It has been suggested that therapeutic ultrasound may have an adjuvant effect and promote healing however its effects are unclear.

objectivesTo determine whether therapeutic ultrasound increases the healing of venous leg ulcers. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (August 2007), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) - The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2007, Ovid MEDLINE - 1950 to July Week 4 2007, Ovid EMBASE - 1980 to 2007 Week 31, Ovid CINAHL - 1982 to August Week 1 2007. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing therapeutic ultrasound with placebo (sham) ultrasound, or other (standard) treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed the results of the searches for eligible RCTs and obtained full reports. A third author assessed the results of the update searches for eligible RCTs. Details from the eligible studies were extracted and summarised by a review author using a data extraction sheet. Attempts were made to contact trial authors to obtain missing data or for clarification. MAIN

resultsA total of eight eligible trials were identified and were all of either medium or high risk of bias. Five trials compared ultrasound therapy with placebo (sham) ultrasound, three trials compared ultrasound therapy with standard treatment. Trials varied in terms of ulcer size, regimen and duration of follow up. No trials individually found a statistically significant difference in the number of ulcers healed between any of the therapies, however on pooling trials (different durations of follow up) for the outcome of risk healing, significantly more ulcers were completely healed with ultrasound (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.09). Some trials also found that ultrasound increases the rate of change of wound size and/or reduces the size of existing ulcers, whilst other trials did not find this effect to be significant. When all trials reporting percentage ulcer area remaining were pooled there was a significant benefit associated with ultrasound (WMD -5.34%, 95% CI -8.38 to -2.30). AUTHORS'

conclusionsThe available evidence suggests that ultrasound may increase healing of venous leg ulcers. These conclusions are based on the results of only eight small studies of generally poor quality and therefore should be interpreted with caution.

Indexed as

Ultrasonic TherapyHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVaricose UlcerWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID18253986
OpenAlexW4248328837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.