Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18253980›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2008

Vinpocetine for acute ischaemic stroke.

D Bereczki, I Fekete

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cerebrolysin for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Cerebrolysin for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Cerebrolysin for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Cerebrolysin for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  5. Vasoactive drugs for acute stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  6. Vinpocetine for cognitive impairment and dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2003
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D BereczkiSemmelweis University, Department of Neurology, Balassa u. 6., Budapest, Hungary, H-1083. bereczki@neur.sote.hu
I Fekete
Semmelweis University · HUUniversity of Debrecen · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVasoactive and neuroprotective drugs such as vinpocetine are used to treat stroke in some countries.

objectivesTo assess the effect of vinpocetine in acute ischaemic stroke. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched February 2007), MEDLINE (1966 to February 2007) and Scopus (1960 to February 2007). We also searched the Internet Stroke Center Stroke Trials Registry, Google Scholar, the science-specific search engine Scirus and Wanfang Data, the leading information provider in China. We contacted researchers in the field and four pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vinpocetine. Searches were complete to February 2007. SELECTION CRITERIA: Unconfounded randomised trials of vinpocetine compared with placebo, or any other reference treatment, in people with acute ischaemic stroke. We included trials if treatment started no later than 14 days after stroke onset. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently applied the inclusion criteria. One review author extracted the data, which was then checked by the second review author. We assessed trial quality. The primary outcome measure was death or dependency. MAIN

resultsWe included two trials, involving a total of 70 participants. Data for 63 participants were reported in the two trials combined. The rate of death or dependency did not differ between the treatment and placebo groups at one and three months. The 95% confidence intervals for the outcome measures were wide and included the possibility of both significant benefit and significant harm. No adverse effects were reported. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is not enough evidence to evaluate the effect of vinpocetine on survival or dependency in patients with acute ischaemic stroke.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaCalcium Channel BlockersHumansNeuroprotective AgentsPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStrokeVasodilator AgentsVinca AlkaloidsCalcium Channel BlockersNeuroprotective AgentsPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsVasodilator AgentsVinca Alkaloidsvinpocetine

Identifiers

PMID18253980
PMCPMC7034523
OpenAlexW2181047592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.