SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2008
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
88 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 396 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for acute gout.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for trigger finger.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for acute low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Effect of Combined Diclofenac and B Vitamins (Thiamine, Pyridoxine, and Cyanocobalamin) for Low Back Pain Management: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2020Pooled it
- Meta-Analysis of Integrated Therapeutic Methods in Noninvasive Lower Back Pain Therapy (LBP): The Role of Interdisciplinary Functional Diagnostics.Pain research & management · 2020Pooled it
- Should exercises be painful in the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of sports medicine · 2017Pooled it
- Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for sciatica.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- [Conservative treatment of nonspecific, chronic low back pain : Evidence of the efficacy - a systematic literature review].Der Orthopade · 2016Pooled it
- Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for chronic low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Traditional Chinese medicine for neck pain and low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2015Pooled it
- [Subgroup-specific therapy of low back pain: description and validity of two classification systems].Der Orthopade · 2013Pooled it
- Drugs for relief of pain in patients with sciatica: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2012Pooled it
- A systematic review on the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for chronic non-specific low-back pain.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2011Pooled it
- Pharmaceutical policies: effects of restrictions on reimbursement.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Oral cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitors versus other oral analgesics for acute soft tissue injury: systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical drug investigation · 2010Pooled it
- Multiple Suggested Care Alternatives and Decision-Making of Primary Care Physicians: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- A comparative study on the efficacy of dexketoprofen and methylprednisolone in the treatment of acute low back pain.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Trial
- Effectiveness of conditioning + open-label placebo for post-operative pain management in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Pain management · 2025Trial
- Trial
28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most frequently prescribed medications worldwide and are widely used for patients with low-back pain. Selective COX-2 inhibitors are currently available and used for patients with low-back pain.
objectivesThe objective was to assess the effects of NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors in the treatment of non-specific low-back pain and to assess which type of NSAID is most effective. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to and including June 2007 if reported in English, Dutch or German. We also screened references given in relevant reviews and identified trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials and double-blind controlled trials of NSAIDs in non-specific low-back pain with or without sciatica were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality. All studies were also assessed on clinical relevance, from which no further interpretations or conclusions were drawn. If data were considered clinically homogeneous, a meta-analysis was performed. If data were lacking for clinically homogeneous trials, a qualitative analysis was performed using a rating system with four levels of evidence (strong, moderate, limited, no evidence). MAIN
resultsIn total, 65 trials (total number of patients = 11,237) were included in this review. Twenty-eight trials (42%) were considered high quality. Statistically significant effects were found in favour of NSAIDs compared to placebo, but at the cost of statistically significant more side effects. There is moderate evidence that NSAIDs are not more effective than paracetamol for acute low-back pain, but paracetamol had fewer side effects. There is moderate evidence that NSAIDs are not more effective than other drugs for acute low-back pain. There is strong evidence that various types of NSAIDs, including COX-2 NSAIDs, are equally effective for acute low-back pain. COX-2 NSAIDs had statistically significantly fewer side-effects than traditional NSAIDs. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThe evidence from the 65 trials included in this review suggests that NSAIDs are effective for short-term symptomatic relief in patients with acute and chronic low-back pain without sciatica. However, effect sizes are small. Furthermore, there does not seem to be a specific type of NSAID which is clearly more effective than others. The selective COX-2 inhibitors showed fewer side effects compared to traditional NSAIDs in the RCTs included in this review. However, recent studies have shown that COX-2 inhibitors are associated with increased cardiovascular risks in specific patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.