Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18253502›Full record

ArticlePloS one2008

In-silico modeling of the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint.

Bashar Ibrahim, Stephan Diekmann, Eberhard Schmitt, Peter Dittrich

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Trends in mathematical modeling of host-pathogen interactions.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Active transport can greatly enhance Cdc20:Mad2 formation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bashar IbrahimBio System Analysis Group, Institute of Computer Science, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Stephan Diekmann
Eberhard Schmitt
Peter Dittrich
Friedrich Schiller University Jena · DELeibniz Institute on Aging - Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Mitotic Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ((M)SAC) is an evolutionary conserved mechanism that ensures the correct segregation of chromosomes by restraining cell cycle progression from entering anaphase until all chromosomes have made proper bipolar attachments to the mitotic spindle. Its malfunction can lead to cancer. PRINCIPLE

findingsWe have constructed and validated for the human (M)SAC mechanism an in silico dynamical model, integrating 11 proteins and complexes. The model incorporates the perspectives of three central control pathways, namely Mad1/Mad2 induced Cdc20 sequestering based on the Template Model, MCC formation, and APC inhibition. Originating from the biochemical reactions for the underlying molecular processes, non-linear ordinary differential equations for the concentrations of 11 proteins and complexes of the (M)SAC are derived. Most of the kinetic constants are taken from literature, the remaining four unknown parameters are derived by an evolutionary optimization procedure for an objective function describing the dynamics of the APC:Cdc20 complex. MCC:APC dissociation is described by two alternatives, namely the "Dissociation" and the "Convey" model variants. The attachment of the kinetochore to microtubuli is simulated by a switching parameter silencing those reactions which are stopped by the attachment. For both, the Dissociation and the Convey variants, we compare two different scenarios concerning the microtubule attachment dependent control of the dissociation reaction. Our model is validated by simulation of ten perturbation experiments.

conclusionOnly in the controlled case, our models show (M)SAC behaviour at meta- to anaphase transition in agreement with experimental observations. Our simulations revealed that for (M)SAC activation, Cdc20 is not fully sequestered; instead APC is inhibited by MCC binding.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalSpindle ApparatusAnaphaseAnaphase-Promoting Complex-CyclosomeCalcium-Binding ProteinsCdc20 ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsComputational BiologyHumansMad2 ProteinsMetaphaseMultiprotein ComplexesNuclear ProteinsRepressor ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein Ligase ComplexesAnaphase-Promoting Complex-CyclosomeCalcium-Binding ProteinsCDC20 protein, humanCdc20 ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsMAD1L1 protein, humanMAD2L1 protein, humanMad2 ProteinsMultiprotein ComplexesNuclear ProteinsRepressor ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein Ligase Complexes

Identifiers

PMID18253502
PMCPMC2215771
OpenAlexW2032700586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.