ArticlePloS one2008
In-silico modeling of the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint.
Article in PloS one, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- A minimal deterministic model reveals integration of spindle assembly and position checkpoints in mitosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Dynamics of spindle assembly and position checkpoints: Integrating molecular mechanisms with computational models.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Trends in mathematical modeling of host-pathogen interactions.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020Review
- Multi-scale stochastic organization-oriented coarse-graining exemplified on the human mitotic checkpoint.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- A Dynamical Model for Activating and Silencing the Mitotic Checkpoint.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Erroneous Silencing of the Mitotic Checkpoint by Aberrant Spindle Pole-Kinetochore Coordination.Biophysical journal · 2015Article
- Systems Biology Modeling of Five Pathways for Regulation and Potent Inhibition of the Anaphase-Promoting Complex (APC/C): Pivotal Roles for MCC and BubR1.Omics : a journal of integrative biology · 2015Article
- Spindle assembly checkpoint is sufficient for complete Cdc20 sequestering in mitotic control.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2015Article
- Active transport can greatly enhance Cdc20:Mad2 formation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2014Article
- Spatial-temporal model for silencing of the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint.Nature communications · 2014Article
- Effects of small particle numbers on long-term behaviour in discrete biochemical systems.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2014Article
- Electro-acoustic behavior of the mitotic spindle: a semi-classical coarse-grained model.PloS one · 2014Article
- Article
- Spatial rule-based modeling: a method and its application to the human mitotic kinetochore.Cells · 2013Article
- Article
- Using default constraints of the spindle assembly checkpoint to estimate the associated chemical rates.BMC biophysics · 2012Article
- Cycles and the qualitative evolution of chemical systems.PloS one · 2012Article
- A quantitative systems view of the spindle assembly checkpoint.The EMBO journal · 2009Review
- Reverse engineering of the spindle assembly checkpoint.PloS one · 2009Article
- Temporal controls of the asymmetric cell division cycle in Caulobacter crescentus.PLoS computational biology · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Mitotic Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ((M)SAC) is an evolutionary conserved mechanism that ensures the correct segregation of chromosomes by restraining cell cycle progression from entering anaphase until all chromosomes have made proper bipolar attachments to the mitotic spindle. Its malfunction can lead to cancer. PRINCIPLE
findingsWe have constructed and validated for the human (M)SAC mechanism an in silico dynamical model, integrating 11 proteins and complexes. The model incorporates the perspectives of three central control pathways, namely Mad1/Mad2 induced Cdc20 sequestering based on the Template Model, MCC formation, and APC inhibition. Originating from the biochemical reactions for the underlying molecular processes, non-linear ordinary differential equations for the concentrations of 11 proteins and complexes of the (M)SAC are derived. Most of the kinetic constants are taken from literature, the remaining four unknown parameters are derived by an evolutionary optimization procedure for an objective function describing the dynamics of the APC:Cdc20 complex. MCC:APC dissociation is described by two alternatives, namely the "Dissociation" and the "Convey" model variants. The attachment of the kinetochore to microtubuli is simulated by a switching parameter silencing those reactions which are stopped by the attachment. For both, the Dissociation and the Convey variants, we compare two different scenarios concerning the microtubule attachment dependent control of the dissociation reaction. Our model is validated by simulation of ten perturbation experiments.
conclusionOnly in the controlled case, our models show (M)SAC behaviour at meta- to anaphase transition in agreement with experimental observations. Our simulations revealed that for (M)SAC activation, Cdc20 is not fully sequestered; instead APC is inhibited by MCC binding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.