Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18253465›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of plant genomics2007

Evaluation of global RNA amplification and its use for high-throughput transcript analysis of laser-microdissected endosperm.

Robert C Day, Les McNoe, Richard C Macknight

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of plant genomics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genomic dissection of the seed.Frontiers in plant science · 2014
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robert C DayDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Les McNoe
Richard C Macknight

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laser microdissection (LM) provides a useful method for isolating specific cells or tissues from biological samples. Here, we adapted microdissection protocols to allow high-resolution transcript analysis of different tissues from developing Arabidopsis seed. Sufficient RNA ( approximately 50 ng) was extracted from endosperm tissue for RT-PCR. However, to obtain enough RNA for microarray analyses, it was necessary to amplify the RNA. PCR- and IVT-based amplification methods were investigated and several important technical aspects of amplification were identified (such as target truncation and alterations in signal intensity). We found that when starting from only 50 ng of RNA, amplification methods based on PCR and IVT produced sufficient product for reliable microarray hybridizations, with two-round IVT giving the best results. Microarray analyses, using endosperm-derived RNA amplified by two-round IVT, reproducibly identified endosperm enriched marker genes. Thus, when combined with RNA-amplification protocols, LM is a robust and reliable technique for high-throughput tissue-specific gene expression analysis.

Identifiers

PMID18253465
PMCPMC1939914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.