Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18252213›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2008

Gross deletions involving IGHM, BTK, or Artemis: a model for genomic lesions mediated by transposable elements.

Menno C van Zelm, Corinne Geertsema, Nicole Nieuwenhuis, Dick de Ridder, Mary Ellen Conley, Claudine Schiff, Ilhan Tezcan, Ewa Bernatowska, Nico G Hartwig, Elisabeth A M Sanders and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Influenza-specific IgG1Clinical & translational immunology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Clinical implications of systematic phenotyping and exome sequencing in patients with primary antibody deficiency.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Menno C van ZelmDepartment of Immunology, Erasmus MC, 3015 GE Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Corinne Geertsema
Nicole Nieuwenhuis
Dick de Ridder
Mary Ellen Conley
Claudine Schiff
Ilhan Tezcan
Ewa Bernatowska
Nico G Hartwig
Elisabeth A M Sanders
Jiri Litzman
Irina Kondratenko
Jacques J M van Dongen
Mirjam van der Burg
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLBoston Children's Hospital · USCentre d’Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy · FRChildren's Memorial Health Institute · PLDelft University of Technology · NLHacettepe University · TRMasaryk University · CZUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most genetic disruptions underlying human disease are microlesions, whereas gross lesions are rare with gross deletions being most frequently found (6%). Similar observations have been made in primary immunodeficiency genes, such as BTK, but for unknown reasons the IGHM and DCLRE1C (Artemis) gene defects frequently represent gross deletions ( approximately 60%). We characterized the gross deletion breakpoints in IGHM-, BTK-, and Artemis-deficient patients. The IGHM deletion breakpoints did not show involvement of recombination signal sequences or immunoglobulin switch regions. Instead, five IGHM, eight BTK, and five unique Artemis breakpoints were located in or near sequences derived from transposable elements (TE). The breakpoints of four out of five disrupted Artemis alleles were located in highly homologous regions, similar to Ig subclass deficiencies and Vh deletion polymorphisms. Nevertheless, these observations suggest a role for TEs in mediating gross deletions. The identified gross deletion breakpoints were mostly located in TE subclasses that were specifically overrepresented in the involved gene as compared to the average in the human genome. This concerned both long (LINE1) and short (Alu, MIR) interspersed elements, as well as LTR retrotransposons (ERV). Furthermore, a high total TE content (>40%) was associated with an increased frequency of gross deletions. Both findings were further investigated and confirmed in a total set of 20 genes disrupted in human disease. Thus, to our knowledge for the first time, we provide evidence that a high TE content, irrespective of the type of element, results in the increased incidence of gross deletions as gene disruption underlying human disease.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticAgammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine KinaseBase SequenceDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA BreaksDNA Transposable ElementsEndonucleasesGenome, HumanHumansImmunoglobulin mu-ChainsInterspersed Repetitive SequencesMolecular Sequence DataMutationNuclear ProteinsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesSequence Analysis, DNAAgammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine KinaseBTK protein, humanDCLRE1C protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Transposable ElementsEndonucleasesImmunoglobulin mu-ChainsNuclear ProteinsProtein-Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID18252213
PMCPMC2427306
OpenAlexW2112846033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.