Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18248683›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2008

Does the surgeon still have a role to play in the diagnosis and management of lymphomas?

Gareth Morris-Stiff, Peipei Cheang, Steve Key, Anju Verghese, Timothy J Havard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Incidental lymphadenopathy in renal transplantation.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Hodgkin's lymphoma presenting as chylothorax.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Waiting time to lymph node biopsy is dependent on referral method: don't write, phone!Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gareth Morris-StiffDepartment of Surgery, Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Ynysmaerdy, Llantrisant, UK. garethmorrisstiff@hotmail.com
Peipei Cheang
Steve Key
Anju Verghese
Timothy J Havard
Royal Glamorgan Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the course of the past 40 years, there have been a significant number of changes in the way in which lymphomatous disease is diagnosed and managed. With the advent of computed tomography, there is little role for staging laparotomy and the surgeon's role may now more diagnostic than therapeutic.

aimsTo review all cases of lymphoma diagnosed at a single institution in order determine the current role of the surgeon in the diagnosis and management of lymphoma. PATIENTS AND

methodsComputerized pathology records were reviewed for a five-year period 1996 to 2000 to determine all cases of lymph node biopsy (incisional or excisional) in which tissue was obtained as part of a planned procedure. Cases of incidental lymphadenopathy were thus excluded.

resultsA total of 297 biopsies were performed of which 62 (21%) yielded lymphomas. There were 22 females and 40 males with a median age of 58 years (range: 19-84 years). The lymphomas were classified as 80% non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, 18% Hodgkin's lymphoma and 2% post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Diagnosis was established by general surgeons (n = 48), ENT surgeons (n = 9), radiologists (n = 4) and ophthalmic surgeons (n = 1). The distribution of excised lymph nodes was: cervical (n = 23), inguinal (n = 15), axillary (n = 11), intra-abdominal (n = 6), submandibular (n = 2), supraclavicular (n = 2), periorbital (n = 1), parotid (n = 1) and mediastinal (n = 1). Fine needle aspiration cytology had been performed prior to biopsy in only 32 (52%) cases and had suggested: lymphoma (n = 10), reactive changes (n = 13), normal (n = 5), inadequate (n = 4). The majority (78%) of cervical lymph nodes were subjected to FNAC prior to biopsy whilst this was performed in only 36% of non-cervical lymphadenopathy.

conclusionThe study has shown that lymphoma is a relatively common cause of surgical lymphadenopathy. Given the limitations of FNAC, all suspicious lymph nodes should be biopsied following FNAC even if the FNAC is reported normal or demonstrating reactive changes only. With the more widespread application of molecular techniques, and the development of improved minimally-invasive procedures, percutaneous and endoscopic techniques may come to dominate, however, at present; the surgeon still has an important role to play in the diagnosis if not treatment of lymphomas.

Indexed as

Biopsy, Fine-NeedlePhysician's RoleAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHodgkin DiseaseHumansImmunohistochemistryLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesLymphoma, Non-HodgkinMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID18248683
PMCPMC2254406
OpenAlexW2023294534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.