ArticleWorld journal of urology2008
Does tourniquet application alter the nitrergic responses of rabbit corpus cavernosum penis? A functional study.
Article in World journal of urology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between penile ischemia duration and complications after hypospadias repair in children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Clinical and penile Doppler outcomes using a modified, tourniquet free, Nesbit plication for severe Peyronie's disease.Translational andrology and urology · 2021Article
- Regional hypothermia attenuates secondary-injury caused by time-out application of tourniquets following limb fragments injury combined with hemorrhagic shock.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2019Article
- Tourniquet and adrenaline use in hypospadias surgery: a survey on the current practice in Turkey.Turkish journal of urology · 2019Article
- The penile tourniquet.Asian journal of andrology · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the effects of short and long periods of tourniquet application on corporal nerves, endothelium and smooth muscle responses.
methodsAfter the rabbits were anesthetized with xylazine (5 mg/kg) and ketamine hydrochloride (35 mg/kg), a standard rubber circular band was applied to the base of the penis. After waiting for 20, 40 and 60 min, the tourniquets were removed and the penil tissue was reperfused for 5 min. In all groups, relaxation [carbachol, sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and electrical field stimulation (EFS) and contraction (phenylephrine and EFS)] responses were examined. In another set of experiments, the rabbits were killed 24 h after the tourniquet period of 60 min and carbachol-induced relaxation responses were obtained.
resultsSNP- and EFS-induced relaxation responses were similar in all groups. Carbachol-induced relaxation responses were not altered in tissues from 20 min tourniquet group, but they were significantly reduced in tissues from 40 and 60 min tourniquet group compared to that from control group. The impaired endothelium-mediated relaxation responses did not return to control levels after 24 h of reperfusion period. Neither phenylephrine nor EFS-mediated contraction responses were altered with tourniquet application.
conclusionsThe results suggest that long period of tourniquet application altered endothelium-dependent muscarinic receptor-mediated relaxation responses. This is the first functional study that examined the effects of tourniquet application on corpus cavernosum tissue. In conclusion, it can be suggested that if tourniquet is necessary in penile surgery the application time of up to 20 min is more appropriate instead of prolonged usage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.