ReviewPlant cell reports2008
Advances in molecular marker techniques and their applications in plant sciences.
Review in Plant cell reports, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 173 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
173 citing papers in PubMed, 923 citations in OpenAlex.
- SSR Marker-Assisted Selection and Monitoring of High-Metabolite Cell Lines in Plant Tissue Culture: Protocols and Somaclonal Variation Assessment.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027Article
- Genetic diversity of Camelina sativa: implications for sustainable crop improvement through Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS).BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- SSR and IRAP-based genetic diversity analysis for core collection of Idesia polycarpa.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Investigating the genetic potential of Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera L. Dunal) germplasm through SCoT and EST-SSR molecular markers.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Genome wide comparative analysis of microsatellites in Bipolaris sorokiniana for diversity analysis and spot blotch disease diagnosis in wheat.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Development of One-Tube Multiplex Arbitrary (RAPD and ISSR) Marker-Based SCAR Assay for Simultaneous Detection and Authentication of Indian Senna (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Integration and imputation of GBS-derived and DArTseq-derived SNP markers in assessing genetic diversity of bread wheat genotypes.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Start codon targeted (SCoT) based molecular diversity and population structure analysis in black turmeric (Curcuma caesia Roxb.).BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Comparative chloroplast genomics reveals codon usage bias, simple sequence repeat dynamics, and phylogenomic relationships in Urticaceae.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Phylogenetic analysis of Dianthus using ITS and RAPD markers reveals insights for carnation breeding.Botanical studies · 2025Article
- Article
- MKDESIGNER and TASEQ: a set of tools for plant genotyping by targeted amplicon sequencing.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Core construction establishment for Ruchengbaimao tea based on SSR markers.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Structure-based virtual screening aids the identification of glycosyltransferases in the biosynthesis of salidroside.Plant biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Development of novel InDel markers by whole-genome sequence comparison and genetic diversity assessment of Thailand rice blast fungus populations.Stress biology · 2025Article
- Genetic Diversity Assessment and Core Germplasm Screening of Blackcurrant (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Genetic Diversity Analysis and Core Germplasm Collection Construction of Tartary Buckwheat Based on SSR Markers.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Genetic Variation for Wild Populations of the Rare and Endangered PlantCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- From Species to Varieties: How Modern Sequencing Technologies Are Shaping Medicinal Plant Identification.Genes · 2024Review
113 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detection and analysis of genetic variation can help us to understand the molecular basis of various biological phenomena in plants. Since the entire plant kingdom cannot be covered under sequencing projects, molecular markers and their correlation to phenotypes provide us with requisite landmarks for elucidation of genetic variation. Genetic or DNA based marker techniques such as RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism), RAPD (random amplified polymorphic DNA), SSR (simple sequence repeats) and AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) are routinely being used in ecological, evolutionary, taxonomical, phylogenic and genetic studies of plant sciences. These techniques are well established and their advantages as well as limitations have been realized. In recent years, a new class of advanced techniques has emerged, primarily derived from combination of earlier basic techniques. Advanced marker techniques tend to amalgamate advantageous features of several basic techniques. The newer methods also incorporate modifications in the methodology of basic techniques to increase the sensitivity and resolution to detect genetic discontinuity and distinctiveness. The advanced marker techniques also utilize newer class of DNA elements such as retrotransposons, mitochondrial and chloroplast based microsatellites, thereby revealing genetic variation through increased genome coverage. Techniques such as RAPD and AFLP are also being applied to cDNA-based templates to study patterns of gene expression and uncover the genetic basis of biological responses. The review details account of techniques used in identification of markers and their applicability in plant sciences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.