Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18245362›Full record

ArticleGenetics2008

Maternal effects as the cause of parent-of-origin effects that mimic genomic imprinting.

Reinmar Hager, James M Cheverud, Jason B Wolf

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genetic Evaluation of Beef Sires Using a Beef-on-Dairy Crossbred Reference Population.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Abundant Parent-of-origin Effect eQTL: The Framingham Heart Study.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. On the resolution of sexual conflict over shared traits.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Reinmar HagerFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
James M Cheverud
Jason B Wolf
University of Manchester · GBWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Genetics Basis of Dietary Obesity in MiceR01DK055736 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CHEVERUD, JAMES M · 2000 to 2009
$2.1M
GENETIC BASIS OF DIETARY OBESITY IN MICER56DK055736 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CHEVERUD, JAMES M · 2010 to 2010
$354k
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C516936/1NIDDK NIH HHS DK055736NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK055736NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK055736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic effects are increasingly recognized as an important source of variation in complex traits and have emerged as the focus of a rapidly expanding area of research. Principle among these effects is genomic imprinting, which has generally been examined in analyses of complex traits by testing for parent-of-origin-dependent effects of alleles. However, in most of these analyses maternal effects are confounded with genomic imprinting because they can produce the same patterns of phenotypic variation expected for various forms of imprinting. Distinguishing between the two is critical for genetic and evolutionary studies because they have entirely different patterns of gene expression and evolutionary dynamics. Using a simple single-locus model, we show that maternal genetic effects can result in patterns that mimic those expected under genomic imprinting. We further demonstrate how maternal effects and imprinting effects can be distinguished using genomic data from parents and offspring. The model results are applied to a genome scan for quantitative trait loci (QTL) affecting growth- and weight-related traits in mice to illustrate how maternal effects can mimic imprinting. This genome scan revealed five separate maternal-effect loci that caused a diversity of patterns mimicking those expected under various modes of genomic imprinting. These results demonstrate that the appearance of parent-of-origin-dependent effects (POEs) of alleles at a locus cannot be taken as direct evidence that the locus is imprinted. Moreover, they show that, in gene mapping studies, genetic data from both parents and offspring are required to successfully differentiate between imprinting and maternal effects as the cause of apparent parent-of-origin effects of alleles.

Indexed as

AllelesAnimalsFemaleGenomic ImprintingGenotypeInheritance PatternsMiceQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

PMID18245362
PMCPMC2278069
OpenAlexW2132491358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.