Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18243686›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2008

Folding landscapes of ankyrin repeat proteins: experiments meet theory.

Doug Barrick, Diego U Ferreiro, Elizabeth A Komives

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An ankyrin repeat chaperone targets toxic oligomers during amyloidogenesis.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Evolution and folding of repeat proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Doug BarrickT.C. Jenkins Department of Biophysics, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400N, Charles St. Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Diego U Ferreiro
Elizabeth A Komives
Center for Theoretical Biological Physics · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

STRUCTURE AND STABILITY OF IKB/NF-KB COMPLEXESP01GM071862 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI KOMIVES, ELIZABETH A. · 2006 to 2016
$14.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM071862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nearly 6% of eukaryotic protein sequences contain ankyrin repeat (AR) domains, which consist of several repeats and often function in binding. AR proteins show highly cooperative folding despite a lack of long-range contacts. Both theory and experiment converge to explain that formation of the interface between elements is more favorable than formation of any individual repeat unit. IkappaBalpha and Notch both undergo partial folding upon binding perhaps influencing the binding free energy. The simple architecture, combined with identification of consensus residues that are important for stability, has enabled systematic perturbation of the energy landscape by single point mutations that affect stability or by addition of consensus repeats. The folding energy landscapes appear highly plastic, with small perturbations re-routing folding pathways.

Indexed as

Ankyrin RepeatAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAnkyrinsConsensus SequenceHumansKineticsModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataProtein ConformationProtein FoldingProteinsAnkyrinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID18243686
PMCPMC2680087
OpenAlexW2126189887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.