Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18243250›Full record

ArticleMutation research2008

Binding of MutS protein to oligonucleotides containing a methylated or an ethylated guanine residue, and correlation with mutation frequency.

Kentaro Taira, Shintaro Nakamura, Khota Nakano, Daisuke Maehara, Keinosuke Okamoto, Sakae Arimoto, David Loakes, Leroy Worth, Roel M Schaaper, Kohji Seio and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Mutation research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Chloroethylating anticancer drug-induced mutagenesis and its repair inGenes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kentaro TairaGraduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Tsushima, Okayama 700-8530, Japan.
Shintaro Nakamura
Khota Nakano
Daisuke Maehara
Keinosuke Okamoto
Sakae Arimoto
David Loakes
Leroy Worth
Roel M Schaaper
Kohji Seio
Mitsuo Sekine
Kazuo Negishi
Tomoe Negishi
Okayama University · JPResearch Triangle Park Foundation · USTokyo Institute of Technology · JPMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GB

Funding

Mutagenic And Toxic Effects Of Base AnalogsZIAES050170 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SCHAAPER, ROELAND · 2009 to 2014
$1.7M
Mutagenic And Toxic Effects Of Base AnalogsZ01ES050170 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SCHAAPER, ROELAND · 2000 to 2008
$1.3M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 ES050170Medical Research Council MC_U105178804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The MutS-based mismatch repair (MMR) system has been conserved from prokaryotes to humans, and plays important roles in maintaining the high fidelity of genomic DNA. MutS protein recognizes several different types of modified base pairs, including methylated guanine-containing base pairs. Here, we looked at the relationship between recognition and the effects of methylating versus ethylating agents on mutagenesis, using a MutS-deficient strain of E. coli. We find that while methylating agents induce mutations more effectively in a MutS-deficient strain than in wild-type, this genetic background does not affect mutagenicity by ethylating agents. Thus, the role of E. coli MMR with methylation-induced mutagenesis appears to be greater than ethylation-induced mutagenesis. To further understand this difference an early step of repair was examined with these alkylating agents. A comparison of binding affinities of MutS with O(6)-alkylated guanine base paired with thymine, which could lead to transition mutations, versus cytosine which could not, was tested. Moreover, we compared binding of MutS to oligoduplexes containing different base pairs; namely, O(6)-MeG:T, O(6)-MeG:C, O(6)-EtG:T, O(6)-EtG:C, G:T and G:C. Dissociation constants (K(d)), which reflect the strength of binding, followed the order G:T->O(6)-MeG:T->O(6)-EtG:T-=O(6)-EtG:C-> or =O(6)-MeG:C->G:C. These results suggest that a thymine base paired with O(6)-methyl guanine is specifically recognized by MutS and therefore should be removed more efficiently than a thymine opposite O(6)-ethylated guanine. Taken together, the data suggest that in E. coli, the MMR system plays a more significant role in repair of methylation-induced lesions than those caused by ethylation.

Indexed as

MutationAlkylating AgentsAlkylationBase SequenceEscherichia coli ProteinsGene FrequencyGuanineMolecular Sequence DataMutS DNA Mismatch-Binding ProteinOligonucleotidesAlkylating AgentsEscherichia coli ProteinsGuanineMutS DNA Mismatch-Binding ProteinMutS protein, E coliOligonucleotides

Identifiers

PMID18243250
PMCPMC2365708
OpenAlexW2162991490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.