Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18241890›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2008

The funnel approach to the precrystallization production of membrane proteins.

Oded Lewinson, Allen T Lee, Douglas C Rees

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Protein folding: Funnel model revised.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Membrane proteins, detergents and crystals: what is the state of the art?Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2014
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Oded LewinsonDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering 114-96, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Allen T Lee
Douglas C Rees

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Challenges in the production of integral membrane proteins for structural studies include low expression levels, incorrect membrane insertion, aggregation and instability. In this report, we describe a "funnel approach" to overcoming these difficulties and demonstrate its efficacy in a case study of 36 prokaryotic P-type transporters. A diverse ensemble of modified constructs is generated and tested for expression in Escherichia coli, membrane localization, detergent extraction, and homogeneity. High-throughput methodologies are implemented throughout the process to facilitate identification of promising targets. We find that the choice of promoter, the choice of source organism providing the cloned gene, and, most importantly, the position of the affinity tag have a great effect on successful production. The latter had pronounced effects at all tested levels, from expression levels observed in whole cells to the extent of membrane insertion, and even on protein function. Following the initial streamlined screening, we were able to fine-tune and produce 9 of the 36 targets as materials suitable for crystallization or other structural studies.

Indexed as

Blotting, WesternChromatography, GelCloning, MolecularCrystallizationDetergentsElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelEscherichia coliGenes, BacterialMembrane ProteinsMetalsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular BiologyProtein TransportThermodynamicsDetergentsMembrane ProteinsMetals

Identifiers

PMID18241890
PMCPMC2362151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.