Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18241751›Full record

ArticleJournal of vascular surgery2008

Informed consent for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: assessing variations in surgeon opinion through a national survey.

Loren Berman, Alan Dardik, Elizabeth H Bradley, Richard J Gusberg, Liana Fraenkel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vascular surgery, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. P5 medicine: a plus for a personalized approach to oncology.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2011
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Limitations of online information on abdominal aortic aneurysm.International journal of vascular medicine · 2010
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Loren BermanYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. loren.berman@yale.edu <loren.berman@yale.edu>
Alan Dardik
Elizabeth H Bradley
Richard J Gusberg
Liana Fraenkel

Funding

Eliciting Patient Treatment Preferences for OsteoporosisK23AR048826 · NIAMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI FRAENKEL, LIANA · 2004 to 2008
$659k
Flow responses to carotid angioplastyK08HL079927 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI DARDIK, ALAN · 2006 to 2009
$532k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL079927NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL079927NIAMS NIH HHS AR048826-01NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR048826
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveInformed consent discussions for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair should reflect appropriate risks of the open or endovascular repair (EVAR), but few guidelines exist describing what surgeons should discuss. This study examines expert opinion regarding what constitutes informed consent.

methodsDesign. We conducted an anonymous, web-based, national survey of vascular surgeons. Associations between surgeon characteristics and opinions regarding informed consent were measured using bivariate statistics; multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate effects adjusted for covariates. Setting. Academic and private practice surgeons were surveyed. Subjects. United States members of the International Society for Vascular Surgery membership. Main Outcome Measure. Surgeons' self-reported opinions regarding the content of informed consent for AAA repair.

resultsA total of 199 surgeons completed the survey (response rate 51%). More than 90% of respondents reported that it was essential to discuss mortality risk for both procedures. However, only 60% and 30% of respondents reported that it was essential to discuss the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke, respectively. Opinions varied by procedure regarding the risks of impotence (32% vs 62%; EVAR vs open repair), reintervention (78% vs 17%), and rupture during long-term follow-up (57% vs 17%). Younger and private practice surgeons were more likely to discuss complications compared with older surgeons and those in academic practice. Surgeons who perform predominantly EVAR were more likely to quote higher mortality rates for open repair (odds ration [OR] = 3.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.4-6.4) and lower reintervention rates for EVAR (OR = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.1-0.7) compared with other surgeons.

conclusionsThis is the first study of the practice of informed consent for AAA repair. The only risk that the vast majority of surgeons agreed should be included in informed consent for AAA repair was mortality. Significant variation exists regarding whether other complications should be discussed and what complication rates should be quoted. Surgeon characteristics may influence how risks are presented to patients. Further efforts are needed to develop guidelines to ensure consistent communication of appropriate risk during informed consent for AAA repair.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelInformed ConsentAdultAgedAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalAortic RuptureCross-Sectional StudiesElective Surgical ProceduresErectile DysfunctionFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansInternetLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID18241751
PMCPMC2659171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.