ArticleGenome biology2008
Do Alu repeats drive the evolution of the primate transcriptome?
Article in Genome biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Maximum lifespan and brain size in mammals are associated with gene family size expansion related to immune system functions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A high-quality, long-read genome assembly of the endangered ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta).GigaScience · 2022Article
- Exploratory bioinformatics investigation reveals importance of "junk" DNA in early embryo development.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Shape-based alignment of genomic landscapes in multi-scale resolution.Nucleic acids research · 2012Article
- Spatiotemporal transcription of the P element and the 412 retrotransposon during embryogenesis of Drosophila melanogaster and D. willistoni.Genetics and molecular biology · 2011Article
- Genomic signatures of germline gene expression.Genome research · 2010Article
- Comparison of computational models for assessing conservation of gene expression across species.PloS one · 2010Article
- Genes devoid of full-length transposable element insertions are involved in development and in the regulation of transcription in human and closely related species.Journal of molecular evolution · 2010Article
- Measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keep.Biology direct · 2010Article
- A problem with the correlation coefficient as a measure of gene expression divergence.Genetics · 2009Article
- Complex selection on 5' splice sites in intron-rich organisms.Genome research · 2009Article
- An alternative approach to medical genetics based on modern evolutionary biology. Part 2: retroviral symbiosis.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2009Review
- The effect of transposable element insertions on gene expression evolution in rodents.PloS one · 2009Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOf all repetitive elements in the human genome, Alus are unusual in being enriched near to genes that are expressed across a broad range of tissues. This has led to the proposal that Alus might be modifying the expression breadth of neighboring genes, possibly by providing CpG islands, modifying transcription factor binding, or altering chromatin structure. Here we consider whether Alus have increased expression breadth of genes in their vicinity.
resultsContrary to the modification hypothesis, we find that those genes that have always had broad expression are richest in Alus, whereas those that are more likely to have become more broadly expressed have lower enrichment. This finding is consistent with a model in which Alus accumulate near broadly expressed genes but do not affect their expression breadth. Furthermore, this model is consistent with the finding that expression breadth of mouse genes predicts Alu density near their human orthologs. However, Alus were found to be related to some alternative measures of transcription profile divergence, although evidence is contradictory as to whether Alus associate with lowly or highly diverged genes. If Alu have any effect it is not by provision of CpG islands, because they are especially rare near to transcriptional start sites. Previously reported Alu enrichment for genes serving certain cellular functions, suggested to be evidence of functional importance of Alus, appears to be partly a byproduct of the association with broadly expressed genes.
conclusionThe abundance of Alu near broadly expressed genes is better explained by their preferential preservation near to housekeeping genes rather than by a modifying effect on expression of genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.