Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18239976›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2008

Isolated hypoxic hepatic perfusion with retrograde outflow in patients with irresectable liver metastases; a new simplified technique in isolated hepatic perfusion.

Cornelis Verhoef, Johannes H W de Wilt, Flavia Brunstein, Andreas W K S Marinelli, Boudewijn van Etten, Maarten Vermaas, Gunther Guetens, Gert de Boeck, Ernst A de Bruijn, Alexander M M Eggermont

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01499979 (In Situ Hypothermic Perfusion During Right Hemihepatectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01499979 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

In Situ Hypothermic Perfusion During Right Hemihepatectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorAcademisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)Ran2012 to 2015Enrolled22ConditionsHepatic Ischemia-reperfusion InjuryArmsIn situ hypothermic perfusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cornelis VerhoefDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Centre-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Centre, PO Box 5201, 3008 AE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. c.verhoef@erasmusmc.nl
Johannes H W de Wilt
Flavia Brunstein
Andreas W K S Marinelli
Boudewijn van Etten
Maarten Vermaas
Gunther Guetens
Gert de Boeck
Ernst A de Bruijn
Alexander M M Eggermont
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NLKU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIsolated hepatic perfusion with high-dose chemotherapy is a treatment option for patients with irresectable metastases confined to the liver. Prolonged local control and impact on survival have been claimed. Major drawbacks are magnitude and costs of the procedure. We developed an isolated hypoxic hepatic perfusion (IHHP) with retrograde outflow without the need for a heart-lung machine. PATIENTS AND

methodsTwenty-four consecutive patients with irresectable metastases of various origins were treated. IHHP inflow was via the hepatic artery, outflow via the portal vein with occlusion of the retrohepatic caval vein. Radiolabeled albumine was used for leakage monitoring. Melphalan was used at 1-2 mg/kg. A 25-minute perfusion period was followed by a complete washout. Local and systemic melphalan concentrations were determined.

resultsCompared with oxygenated classical IHP, the IHPP procedure reduced operation time from >8 h to 4 hours, blood loss from >4000 to 900 cc and saved material and personnel costs. Leakage was 0% with negligible systemic toxicity and 0% perioperative mortality. Tumor response: complete response (CR) in 4%, partial response (PR) in 58%, and stable disease (SD) in 13%. Median time to progression was 9 months (2-24 months); pharmacokinetics demonstrated intrahepatic melphalan concentrations more than 9 fold higher than postperfusion systemic concentrations.

conclusionsIHPP is a relatively simple procedure with reduced costs, reduced blood loss, no mortality, limited toxicity, and response rates comparable to classic IHP. The median duration of 9 months of tumor control should be improved. Hereto, vasoactive drugs, will be explored in further studies.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingChemotherapy, Cancer, Regional PerfusionColorectal NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionEye NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHepatic ArteryHumansInfusions, Intra-ArterialLiver NeoplasmsMaleMelphalanAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingMelphalan

Identifiers

PMID18239976
PMCPMC2277449
OpenAlexW2167855596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.