Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18239848›Full record

ArticleProtoplasma2008

A new type of microtubular cytoskeleton in microsporogenesis of Lavatera thuringiaca L.

D Tchórzewska, K Winiarczyk, J Pietrusiewicz, J Bednara

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Protoplasma, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D TchórzewskaDepartment of Plant Anatomy and Cytology, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Lublin, Poland. dorotat@biotop.umcs.lublin.pl
K Winiarczyk
J Pietrusiewicz
J Bednara
Maria Curie-Skłodowska University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Lavatera thuringiaca, kariokinesis and simultaneous cytokinesis during the meiotic division of microsporogenesis follow a procedure similar to that which takes place in the majority of members of the class Angiospermae. However, chondriokinesis occurs in a unique way found only in species from the family Malvaceae. Chondriokinesis in such species is well documented, but the relationship between the tubulin cytoskeleton and rearrangement of cell organelles during meiosis in L. thuringiaca has not been precisely defined so far. In this study, the microtubular cytoskeleton was investigated in dividing microsporocytes of L. thuringiaca by immunofluorescence. The meiotic stages and positions of cell organelles were identified by staining with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. We observed that, during prophase I and II, changes in microtubular cytoskeleton configurations have unique features, which have not been described for other plant species. At the end of prophase I, organelles (mostly plastids and mitochondria) form a compact envelope around the nucleus, and the subsequent phases of kariokinesis take place within this arrangement. At this point of cell division, microtubules surround the organelle envelope and separate it from the peripheral cytoplasm, which is devoid of plastids and mitochondria. In telophase I, two newly formed nuclei are tightly surrounded by the cell organelle envelopes, and these are separated by the phragmoplast. Later, when the phragmoplast disappears, cell organelles still surround the nuclei but also move a little, starting to occupy the place of the disappearing phragmoplast. After the breakup of tetrads, the radial microtubule system is well developed, and cell organelles can still be observed as a dense envelope around the nuclei. At a very late stage of sporoderm development, the radial microtubule system disappears, and cell organelles become gradually scattered in the cytoplasm of the microspores. Using colchicines, specific inhibitors of microtubule formation, we investigated the relationship between the tubulin cytoskeleton and the distribution of cell organelles. Our analysis demonstrates that impairment of microtubule organization, which constitutes only a single component of the cytoskeleton, is enough to disturb typical chondriokinesis in L. thuringiaca. This indicates that microtubules (independent of microfilaments) are responsible for the reorganization of cell organelles during meiotic division.

Indexed as

GametogenesisCell NucleusColchicineDNA, PlantFluorescent Antibody TechniqueMalvaceaeMeiotic Prophase IMicrotubulesColchicineDNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID18239848
OpenAlexW1968865436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.