Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18237383›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2008

COX-2 and PPARgamma expression are potential markers of recurrence risk in mammary duct carcinoma in-situ.

Swati Kulkarni, Deepa B Patil, Leslie K Diaz, Elizabeth L Wiley, Monica Morrow, Seema A Khan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Ductal CarcinomaFrontiers in oncology · 2017
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mixed tocopherols prevent mammary tumorigenesis by inhibiting estrogen action and activating PPAR-gamma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2009
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Swati KulkarniLynn Sage Breast Center and Feinberg School of Medicine of Northwestern University, Chicago USA. swati.kulkarni@roswellpark.org
Deepa B Patil
Leslie K Diaz
Elizabeth L Wiley
Monica Morrow
Seema A Khan
Northwestern University · USAbbott Northwestern Hospital · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

SPORE IN BREAST CANCERP50CA089018 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI JORDAN, VIRGIL CRAIG · 2000 to 2004
$14.2M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA089018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn women with duct carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) receiving breast conservation therapy (BCT), in-breast recurrences are seen in approximately 10%, but cannot be accurately predicted using clinical and histological criteria. We performed a case-control study to identify protein markers of local recurrence risk in DCIS.

methodsWomen treated for DCIS with BCT, who later developed in-breast recurrence (cases) were matched by age and year of treatment to women who remained free of recurrence (controls).

resultsA total of 69 women were included in the study, 31 cases and 38 controls. Immunohistochemical evaluation of DCIS tissue arrays was performed for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2/neu, cyclin D1, p53, p21, cycloxygenase-2 (COX-2) and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma). Two markers were significantly different between cases and controls on univariate analysis: strong COX-2 expression was associated with increased risk of recurrence, with 67% vs. 24% positivity in cases and controls p = 0.006; and nuclear expression of PPARgamma was associated with protection from recurrence with 4% vs. 27% positivity in cases and controls, p = 0.024. In a multivariate model which included size, grade, COX-2 and PPARgamma positivity, we found COX-2 positivity to be a strong independent risk factor for recurrence (OR 7.90, 95% CI 1.72-36.23)., whereas size and grade were of borderline significance. PPARgamma expression continued to demonstrate a protective trend, (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.06-1.84).

conclusionOur findings suggest that COX-2 and PPARgamma should be investigated further as biologic markers to predict DCIS recurrence, particularly since they are also potential therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma in SituCase-Control StudiesCyclooxygenase 2FemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPPAR gammaBiomarkers, TumorCyclooxygenase 2PPAR gamma

Identifiers

PMID18237383
PMCPMC2254431
OpenAlexW1975465319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.