Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18234828›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2008

Influence of the lamellar phase unbinding energy on the relative stability of lamellar and inverted cubic phases.

D P Siegel, B G Tenchov

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cubic phases in membrane lipids.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2012
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

D P SiegelGivaudan Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio 45216, USA. david.siegel@givaudan.com
B G Tenchov
Givaudan (Switzerland) · CHNorthwestern University · US

Funding

TiO2 nanocomposites for Targeted Treatment and Imaging of Prostate cancerU54CA119341 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI WOLOSCHAK, GAYLE E. · 2005 to 2009
$19.9M
X-RAY STUDIES OF NEUROFIBRILLARY TANGLES IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE BRAIN TISSUEP41RR008630 · NCRR · ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI IRVING, THOMAS C · 2001 to 2011
$14.4M
ELECTROSTATICALLY MEDIATED MEMBRANE FUSIONR01GM057305 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI MACDONALD, ROBERT C · 1999 to 2005
$685k
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA119341NCI NIH HHS U54CA119341NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR008630NCRR NIH HHS RR08630NIGMS NIH HHS GM57305NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on curvature energy considerations, nonbilayer phase-forming phospholipids in excess water should form stable bicontinuous inverted cubic (Q(II)) phases at temperatures between the lamellar (L(alpha)) and inverted hexagonal (H(II)) phase regions. However, the phosphatidylethanolamines (PEs), which are a common class of biomembrane phospholipids, typically display direct L(alpha)/H(II) phase transitions and may form intermediate Q(II) phases only after the temperature is cycled repeatedly across the L(alpha)/H(II) phase transition temperature, T(H), or when the H(II) phases are cooled from T > T(H). This raises the question of whether models of inverted phase stability, which are based on curvature energy alone, accurately predict the relative free energy of these phases. Here we demonstrate the important role of a noncurvature energy contribution, the unbinding energy of the L(alpha) phase bilayers, g(u), that serves to stabilize the L(alpha) phase relative to the nonlamellar phases. The planar L(alpha) phase bilayers must separate for a Q(II) phase to form and it turns out that the work of their unbinding can be larger than the curvature energy reduction on formation of Q(II) phase from L(alpha) at temperatures near the L(alpha)/Q(II) transition temperature (T(Q)). Using g(u) and elastic constant values typical of unsaturated PEs, we show that g(u) is sufficient to make T(Q) > T(H) for the latter lipids. Such systems would display direct L(alpha) --> H(II) transitions, and a Q(II) phase might only form as a metastable phase upon cooling of the H(II) phase. The g(u) values for methylated PEs and PE/phosphatidylcholine mixtures are significantly smaller than those for PEs and increase T(Q) by only a few degrees, consistent with observations of these systems. This influence of g(u) also rationalizes the effect of some aqueous solutes to increase the rate of Q(II) formation during temperature cycling of lipid dispersions. Finally, the results are relevant to protocols for determining the Gaussian curvature modulus, which substantially affects the energy of intermediates in membrane fusion and fission. Recently, two such methods were proposed based on measuring T(Q) and on measuring Q(II) phase unit cell dimensions, respectively. In view of the effect of g(u) on T(Q) that we describe here, the latter method, which does not depend on the value of g(u), is preferable.

Indexed as

Membrane FluidityModels, ChemicalModels, MolecularComputer SimulationEnergy TransferLipid BilayersMolecular ConformationPhase TransitionPhospholipidsSurface PropertiesLipid BilayersPhospholipids

Identifiers

PMID18234828
PMCPMC2367203
OpenAlexW2022976515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.