Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18234222›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2008

The role of multiple hydrogen-bonding groups in specific alcohol binding sites in proteins: insights from structural studies of LUSH.

Anna B Thode, Schoen W Kruse, Jay C Nix, David N M Jones

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. SNARE Complex-Associated Proteins and Alcohol.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in physiology · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Key Odorants Regulate Food Attraction inFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna B ThodeProgram in Biomolecular Structure, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, 12801 East 17th Avenue, MS 8303, PO Box 6511, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Schoen W Kruse
Jay C Nix
David N M Jones
University of Colorado Denver · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · US

Funding

University of Colorado Cancer Center Support Grant - Lung Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts with Autologous Human Immune SystemsP30CA046934 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI James V Degregori · 1988 to 2026
$117.0M
The Molecular Basis of Alcohol's ActionsR01AA013618 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI JONES, DAVID NIGEL · 2003 to 2010
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046934NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA013618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is now generally accepted that many of the physiological effects of alcohol consumption are a direct result of binding to specific sites in neuronal proteins such as ion channels or other components of neuronal signaling cascades. Binding to these targets generally occurs in water-filled pockets and leads to alterations in protein structure and dynamics. However, the precise interactions required to confer alcohol sensitivity to a particular protein remain undefined. Using information from the previously solved crystal structures of the Drosophila melanogaster protein LUSH in complexes with short-chain alcohols, we have designed and tested the effects of specific amino acid substitutions on alcohol binding. The effects of these substitutions, specifically S52A, T57S, and T57A, were examined using a combination of molecular dynamics, X-ray crystallography, fluorescence spectroscopy, and thermal unfolding. These studies reveal that the binding of ethanol is highly sensitive to small changes in the composition of the alcohol binding site. We find that T57 is the most critical residue for binding alcohols; the T57A substitution completely abolishes binding, while the T57S substitution differentially affects ethanol binding compared to longer-chain alcohols. The additional requirement for a potential hydrogen-bond acceptor at position 52 suggests that both the presence of multiple hydrogen-bonding groups and the identity of the hydrogen-bonding residues are critical for defining an ethanol binding site. These results provide new insights into the detailed chemistry of alcohol's interactions with proteins.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SubstitutionAnimalsButanolsCrystallography, X-RayDrosophila melanogasterEthanolHydrogen BondingModels, MolecularMutagenesis, Site-DirectedProtein BindingReceptors, OdorantButanolsEthanolodorant-binding proteinReceptors, Odorant

Identifiers

PMID18234222
PMCPMC2293277
OpenAlexW1969147219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.