Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18234007›Full record

ArticleAnnals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc2008

QT/RR relationship in patients after remote anterior myocardial infarction with left ventricular dysfunction and different types of ventricular arrhythmias.

Krzysztof Szydlo, Maria Trusz-Gluza, Krystian Wita, Artur Filipecki, Witold Orszulak, Dagmara Urbanczyk, Jolanta Krauze, Jaroslaw Kolasa, Zbigniew Tabor

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Dynamicity of early and late phases of repolarization in patients with remote anterior myocardial infarction: the interlead differences.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2012
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Krzysztof SzydloI Department of Cardiology, Silesian Medical University, Katowice, Poland. krzysztofszydlo@onet.eu
Maria Trusz-Gluza
Krystian Wita
Artur Filipecki
Witold Orszulak
Dagmara Urbanczyk
Jolanta Krauze
Jaroslaw Kolasa
Zbigniew Tabor
Medical University of Silesia · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQT/RR relationship was found to be both rate-dependent and rate-independent, what suggests the influence of autonomic drive and other not-autonomic related factors on it. The steeper QT/RR slope in patients after acute myocardial infarction (MI) was described, but the relationship to ventricular arrhythmias is unknown. The purpose of this study was to calculate differences in QT/RR relationship in patients after remote anterior MI with left ventricular dysfunction and different types of ventricular arrhythmias.

methodsThe cohort of 95 patients (age: 63 +/- 11 years, LVEF: 35 +/- 9%) with previous anterior MI (mean 1.1 years) was divided into two well-matched groups-50 patients without episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) (NoVT/VF: 39 males, 64 +/- 12 years, LVEF 37 +/- 8%) and 45 patients with VT and/or VF (all with ICD implanted) (VT/VF: 35 males, 62 +/- 10 years, LVEF 34 +/- 10%). No true antiarrhythmics were used. QT/RR slope was calculated from 24-hour Holter ECG for the entire recording (E), daytime (D) and nighttime (N) periods.

resultsGroups did not differ in basic clinical data (age, LVEF, treatment). QT/RR slopes were steeper in VT/VF than in NoVT/VF group in all analyzed periods: E - 0.195 +/- 0.03 versus 0.15 +/- 0.03 (P < 0.001), N - 0.190 +/- 0.03 versus 0.138 +/- 0.03 (P < 0.001) and D - 0.200 +/- 0.04 versus 0.152 +/- 0.03 (P < 0.001). No significant day-to-night differences were found in both groups.

conclusionsSteeper QT/RR slope and complete lack of day-to-night differences in VT/VF patients show inappropriate QT adaptation to the heart rate changes. The prognostic significance of this parameter needs prospective studies.

Indexed as

Arrhythmias, CardiacCircadian RhythmCohort StudiesElectrocardiography, AmbulatoryFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionTachycardia, VentricularVentricular Dysfunction, LeftVentricular Fibrillation

Identifiers

PMID18234007
PMCPMC6932037
OpenAlexW1537186626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.