Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18231580›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2008

Evidence of blood stage efficacy with a virosomal malaria vaccine in a phase IIa clinical trial.

Fiona M Thompson, David W Porter, Shinji L Okitsu, Nicole Westerfeld, Denise Vogel, Stephen Todryk, Ian Poulton, Simon Correa, Claire Hutchings, Tamara Berthoud and 8 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Virosomes: Beyond Vaccines.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Beyond Blood Smears: Qualification ofThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. CXCR3Frontiers in immunology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Fiona M ThompsonCentre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. fiona.thompson@ndm.ox.ac.uk
David W Porter
Shinji L Okitsu
Nicole Westerfeld
Denise Vogel
Stephen Todryk
Ian Poulton
Simon Correa
Claire Hutchings
Tamara Berthoud
Susanna Dunachie
Laura Andrews
Jack L Williams
Robert Sinden
Sarah C Gilbert
Gerd Pluschke
Rinaldo Zurbriggen
Adrian V S Hill
University of Oxford · GBSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHVir Biotechnology (Switzerland) · CHAngkor Hospital for Children · KHImperial College London · GBMRC Unit the Gambia · GMWalter Reed Army Institute of Research · US

Funding

Medical Research Council G0500634Medical Research Council G84/6323
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious research indicates that a combination vaccine targeting different stages of the malaria life cycle is likely to provide the most effective malaria vaccine. This trial was the first to combine two existing vaccination strategies to produce a vaccine that induces immune responses to both the pre-erythrocytic and blood stages of the P. falciparum life cycle.

methodsThis was a Phase I/IIa study of a new combination malaria vaccine FFM ME-TRAP+PEV3A. PEV3A includes peptides from both the pre-erythrocytic circumsporozoite protein and the blood-stage antigen AMA-1. This study was conducted at the Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. The participants were healthy, malaria naïve volunteers, from Oxford. The interventions were vaccination with PEV3A alone, or PEV3A+FFM ME-TRAP. The main outcome measure was protection from malaria in a sporozoite challenge model. Other outcomes included measures of parasite specific immune responses induced by either vaccine; and safety, assessed by collection of adverse event data.

resultsWe observed evidence of blood stage immunity in PEV3A vaccinated volunteers, but no volunteers were completely protected from malaria. PEV3A induced high antibody titres, and antibodies bound parasites in immunofluorescence assays. Moreover, we observed boosting of the vaccine-induced immune response by sporozoite challenge. Immune responses induced by FFM ME-TRAP were unexpectedly low. The vaccines were safe, with comparable side effect profiles to previous trials. Although there was no sterile protection two major observations support an effect of the vaccine-induced response on blood stage parasites: (i) Lower rates of parasite growth were observed in volunteers vaccinated with PEV3A compared to unvaccinated controls (p = 0.012), and this was reflected in the PCR results from PEV3A vaccinated volunteers. These showed early control of parasitaemia by some volunteers in this group. One volunteer, who received PEV3A alone, was diagnosed very late, on day 20 compared to an average of 11.8 days in unvaccinated controls. (ii). Morphologically abnormal parasites were present in the blood of all (n = 24) PEV3A vaccinated volunteers, and in only 2/6 controls (p = 0.001). We describe evidence of vaccine-induced blood stage efficacy for the first time in a sporozoite challenge study.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansMalaria, FalciparumMalaria VaccinesPlasmodium falciparumAntibodies, ProtozoanMalaria Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID18231580
PMCPMC2204057
OpenAlexW1985158166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.