Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18229717›Full record

ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2008

Enabling integrative genomic analysis of high-impact human diseases through text mining.

Joel Dudley, Atul J Butte

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A systematic assessment of linking gene expression with genetic variants for prioritizing candidate targets.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2015
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. TRANSLATING BIOLOGY: TEXT MINING TOOLS THAT WORK.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joel DudleyStanford Medical Informatics, Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5479, USA.
Atul J Butte

Funding

Center for Integration of Research on Genetics and EthicsP50HG003389 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHO, MILDRED K. · 2004 to 2014
$9.9M
Repositioning drugs for the treatment of small cell lung cancerR01GM079719 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BUTTE, ATUL J · 2006 to 2015
$4.4M
CREATION AND APPLICATION OF A DIABETES KNOWLEDGE BASEK22LM008261 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BUTTE, ATUL J. · 2005 to 2007
$460k
NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG003389NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079719NLM NIH HHS K22 LM008261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our limited ability to perform large-scale translational discovery and analysis of disease characterizations from public genomic data repositories remains a major bottleneck in efforts to translate genomics experiments to medicine. Through comprehensive, integrative genomic analysis of all available human disease characterizations we gain crucial insight into the molecular phenomena underlying pathogenesis as well as intra- and inter-disease differentiation. Such knowledge is crucial in the development of improved clinical diagnostics and the identification of molecular targets for novel therapeutics. In this study we build on our previous work to realize the next important step in large-scale translational discovery and analysis, which is to automatically identify those genomic experiments in which a disease state is compared to a normal control state. We present an automated text mining method that employs Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to automatically identify disease-related experiments in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) that include measurements for both disease and normal control states. In this manner, we find that 62% of disease-related experiments contain sample subsets that can be automatically identified as normal controls. Furthermore, we calculate that the identified experiments characterize diseases that contribute to 30% of all human disease-related mortality in the United States. This work demonstrates that we now have the necessary tools and methods to initiate large-scale translational bioinformatics inquiry across the broad spectrum of high-impact human disease.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGenomicsInformation Storage and RetrievalDatabases, GeneticGenetic Diseases, InbornHumansOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPubMedUnified Medical Language System

Identifiers

PMID18229717
PMCPMC2735266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.