Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18229711›Full record

ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2008

Striking similarities in diverse telomerase proteins revealed by combining structure prediction and machine learning approaches.

Jae-Hyung Lee, Michael Hamilton, Colin Gleeson, Cornelia Caragea, Peter Zaback, Jeffry D Sander, Xue Li, Feihong Wu, Michael Terribilini, Vasant Honavar and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Human telomerase model shows the role of the TEN domain in advancing the double helix for the next polymerization step.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jae-Hyung LeeBioinformatics & Computational Biology Program, L.H. Baker Center for Bioinformatics & Biological Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010, USA.
Michael Hamilton
Colin Gleeson
Cornelia Caragea
Peter Zaback
Jeffry D Sander
Xue Li
Feihong Wu
Michael Terribilini
Vasant Honavar
Drena Dobbs
Iowa State University · USColorado State University · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Discovery of Protein Seq.Struct.Func.RelationshipsR33GM066387 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HONAVAR, VASANT G. · 2005 to 2006
$545k
Protein Sequence Structure Function RelationshipsR21GM066387 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HONAVAR, VASANT G. · 2003 to 2004
$291k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 066387NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM066387NIGMS NIH HHS R33 GM066387PHS HHS 0608769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein enzyme that adds telomeric DNA repeat sequences to the ends of linear chromosomes. The enzyme plays pivotal roles in cellular senescence and aging, and because it provides a telomere maintenance mechanism for approximately 90% of human cancers, it is a promising target for cancer therapy. Despite its importance, a high-resolution structure of the telomerase enzyme has been elusive, although a crystal structure of an N-terminal domain (TEN) of the telomerase reverse transcriptase subunit (TERT) from Tetrahymena has been reported. In this study, we used a comparative strategy, in which sequence-based machine learning approaches were integrated with computational structural modeling, to explore the potential conservation of structural and functional features of TERT in phylogenetically diverse species. We generated structural models of the N-terminal domains from human and yeast TERT using a combination of threading and homology modeling with the Tetrahymena TEN structure as a template. Comparative analysis of predicted and experimentally verified DNA and RNA binding residues, in the context of these structures, revealed significant similarities in nucleic acid binding surfaces of Tetrahymena and human TEN domains. In addition, the combined evidence from machine learning and structural modeling identified several specific amino acids that are likely to play a role in binding DNA or RNA, but for which no experimental evidence is currently available.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsArtificial IntelligenceBinding SitesComputational BiologyComputer SimulationConserved SequenceDatabases, ProteinDNAHumansMacromolecular SubstancesModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataProtein ConformationProtein Structure, TertiaryRNADNAMacromolecular SubstancesRNATelomerase

Identifiers

PMID18229711
PMCPMC2569851
OpenAlexW2033791543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.