Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18226514›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2008

Tubulin modifications and their cellular functions.

Jennetta W Hammond, Dawen Cai, Kristen J Verhey

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 234 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
234citing papers in PubMed
21.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

234 citing papers in PubMed, 502 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. An overview of pyridazin-3(2Future medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Tubulin Complexity in Cancer and Metastasis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review

174 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennetta W HammondDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Dawen Cai
Kristen J Verhey
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Regulation of the molecular motor kinesin-IR01GM070862 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI VERHEY, KRISTEN J. · 2005 to 2018
$4.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 070862NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All microtubules are built from a basic alpha/beta-tubulin building block, yet subpopulations of microtubules can be differentially marked by a number of post-translational modifications. These modifications, conserved throughout evolution, are thought to act individually or in combination to control specific microtubule-based functions, analogous to how histone modifications regulate chromatin functions. Here we review recent studies demonstrating that tubulin modifications influence microtubule-associated proteins such as severing proteins, plus-end tracking proteins, and molecular motors. In this way, tubulin modifications play an important role in regulating microtubule properties, such as stability and structure, as well as microtubule-based functions, such as ciliary beating, cell division, and intracellular trafficking.

Indexed as

Protein Processing, Post-TranslationalAcetylationAnimalsDimerizationHumansMicrotubulesProtein Structure, SecondaryTubulinTubulin

Identifiers

PMID18226514
PMCPMC2274889
OpenAlexW2033241989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.