ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2008
Heart rate in the pathophysiology of coronary blood flow and myocardial ischaemia: benefit from selective bradycardic agents.
Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
102 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 236 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of Ivabradine in Combination with Beta-Blockers in Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Advances in therapy · 2022Pooled it
- On-feet isometric bracing maintains cerebral arterial blood velocity during lower body negative pressure via preload augmentation.Experimental physiology · 2026Trial
- Efficacy of Ivabradine in Combination with Beta-Blockers Versus Uptitration of Beta-Blockers in Patients with Stable Angina (CONTROL-2 Study).Advances in therapy · 2018Trial
- Ivabradine in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Preliminary Randomized Prospective Study.Clinical drug investigation · 2016Trial
- Ivabradine in combination with beta-blocker improves symptoms and quality of life in patients with stable angina pectoris: results from the ADDITIONS study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2012Trial
- Rate control in septic shock-associated atrial fibrillation: flow, not heart rate alone, should define haemodynamic success.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- Article
- Functional consequences of diminished myocardial oxygen delivery per beat in experimental heart failure.Basic research in cardiology · 2026Article
- Heart Rate, Electrocardiographic Subclinical Myocardial Injury, and Long-Term Mortality.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Myocardial ischemia: no supply/demand mismatch but reduced blood flow per beat.Basic research in cardiology · 2026Review
- Time course of early and delayed myocardial protection induced by vagal nerve stimulation preconditioning.Basic research in cardiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Joint blood pressure and resting heart rate trajectories and net adverse clinical events risk following PCI: an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Vascular (dys)function in the failing heart.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2025Review
- Effect of Hyperpolarization-Activated Current Blockade on the Isolated Rat Heart during Long-Term Consequences of Experimental Myocardial Infarction.Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine · 2025Article
- Brain‑heart axis: Neurostimulation techniques in ischemic heart disease (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Reinstating respiratory heart rate variability improves hemodynamic responses during exercise in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.Basic research in cardiology · 2025Article
- Ketone Bodies in the Regulation of Myocardial Perfusion in Cardiovascular Disease: Metabolic and Vasodilatory Effects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Pericytes in the brain and heart: functional roles and response to ischaemia and reperfusion.Cardiovascular research · 2025Review
42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Starting out from a brief description of the determinants of coronary blood flow (perfusion, pressure, extravascular compression, autoregulation, metabolic regulation, endothelium-mediated regulation and neurohumoral regulation) the present review highlights the overwhelming importance of metabolic regulation such that coronary blood flow is increased at increased heart rate under physiological circumstances and the overwhelming importance of extravascular compression such that coronary blood flow is decreased at increased heart rate through reduction of diastolic duration in the presence of severe coronary stenoses. The review goes on to characterize the role of heart rate in the redistribution of regional myocardial blood flow between a normal coronary vascular tree with preserved autoregulation and a poststenotic vasculature with exhausted coronary reserve. When flow is normalized by heart rate, there is a consistent close relationship of regional myocardial blood flow and contractile function for each single cardiac cycle no matter whether or not there is a coronary stenosis and what the actual blood flow is. beta-Blockade improves both flow and function along this relationship. When the heart rate reduction associated with beta-blockade is prevented by pacing, alpha-adrenergic coronary vasoconstriction is unmasked and both flow and function are deteriorated. Selective heart rate reduction, however, improves both flow and function without any residual negative effect such as unmasked alpha-adrenergic coronary vasoconstriction or negative inotropic action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.