Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18223171›Full record

ReviewBlood2008

Historical review: megakaryopoiesis and thrombopoiesis.

Kenneth Kaushansky

Registry-linked trialAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03243656 (Randomized Clinical Trial of the Use of & Cyclosporine in Children With Sever Idiopathic Aplastic Anemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 124 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03243656 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Clinical Trial of the Use of & Cyclosporine in Children With Sever Idiopathic Aplastic Anemia

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2017 to 2020Enrolled20ConditionsEltrombopagArmsEltrombopag
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Inside-to-outside and back to the future of megakaryopoiesis.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kenneth KaushanskyDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA 92103-8811, USA. kkaushansky@ucsd.edu

Funding

The Interaction of TPO and Integrins in Hematopoiesis CellsP01HL078784 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GINSBERG, MARK HOWARD · 2005 to 2019
$28.3M
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY OF THROMBOPOIETINR01DK049855 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GEDDIS, AMY E, KAUSHANSKY, KENNETH · 1995 to 2013
$5.0M
GROWTH FACTORS IN NORMAL &NEOPLASTIC HEMATOPOIESISR01CA031615 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KAUSHANSKY, KENNETH · 1985 to 2006
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA031615NCI NIH HHS R01 CA31615-25NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL078784NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL 78784-03NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK049855NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK49855-14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of thrombopoiesis has evolved greatly since an era when platelets were termed "the dust of the blood," only about 100 years ago. During this time megakaryocytes were identified as the origin of blood platelets; marrow-derived megakaryocytic progenitor cells were functionally defined and then purified; and the primary regulator of the process, thrombopoietin, was cloned and characterized and therapeutic thrombopoietic agents developed. During this journey we continue to learn that the physiologic mechanisms that drive proplatelet formation can be recapitulated in cell-free systems and their biochemistry evaluated; the molecular underpinnings of endomitosis are being increasingly understood; the intracellular signals sent by engagement of a large number of megakaryocyte surface receptors have been defined; and many of the transcription factors that drive megakaryocytic fate determination have been identified and experimentally manipulated. While some of these biologic processes mimic those seen in other cell types, megakaryocytes and platelets possess enough unique developmental features that we are virtually assured that continued study of thrombopoiesis will yield innumerable clinical and scientific insights for many decades to come.

Indexed as

ThrombopoiesisAnimalsHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansMegakaryocytesProtein BiosynthesisThrombocytopenia

Identifiers

PMID18223171
PMCPMC2214745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.