ArticleJournal of pain and symptom management2008
Mexiletine therapy for chronic pain: survival analysis identifies factors predicting clinical success.
Article in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness and safety of mexiletine in patients at risk for (recurrent) ventricular arrhythmias: a systematic review.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022Pooled it
- Chasing the Wrong Door for 30 Years: Is Suzetrigine the Key to Selective Pain Relief?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Beyond the traditional oncology patient: the role of palliative care in patients with sickle cell disease receiving stem cell transplantation or gene therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Relevance of mexiletine in the era of evolving antiarrhythmic therapy of ventricular arrhythmias.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024Review
- Patient phenotyping in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments: IMMPACT recommendations.Pain · 2016Review
- Understanding Neuropathic Corneal Pain--Gaps and Current Therapeutic Approaches.Seminars in ophthalmology · 2016Review
- Drug repositioning: playing dirty to kill pain.CNS drugs · 2014Review
- Intravenous lidocaine and mexiletine in the management of trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias.Current pain and headache reports · 2010Review
- Novel insights on diagnosis, cause and treatment of diabetic neuropathy: focus on painful diabetic neuropathy.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2010Article
- Design and assessment of a potent sodium channel blocking derivative of mexiletine for minimizing experimental neuropathic pain in several rat models.Neurochemical research · 2009Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mexiletine, a sodium channel blocker, treats neuropathic pain but its clinical value has been questioned due to its significant side effects and limited efficacy. We hypothesized that ongoing therapy with mexiletine would have limited patient acceptance, but that an analgesic response to intravenous (IV) lidocaine (a pharmacologically similar drug) would identify patients most likely to choose ongoing therapy with mexiletine. We identified a cohort of 37 patients with neuropathic pain who underwent IV lidocaine infusions at our institution and were subsequently prescribed mexiletine. Time until discontinuation of mexiletine was used as the primary endpoint. Time until discontinuation is a clinically relevant, discrete, objective endpoint gaining acceptance as a metric for assessing clinical performance of drugs with significant side effects and limited efficacy. We used the techniques of survival analysis to determine factors that predicted continued therapy with mexiletine. Median time to discontinuation of mexiletine was only 43 days. A stronger analgesic response to IV lidocaine significantly predicted continued acceptance of mexiletine therapy. Decreasing age and male gender also predicted continued acceptance of mexiletine therapy. Analyzing time to mexiletine discontinuation uncovers important limitations in mexiletine's clinical performance missed by studies with conventional endpoints, such as change in pain score. Despite claims of efficacy, acceptance of mexiletine therapy is poor overall. Test infusions with lidocaine identify patients most likely to continue mexiletine therapy. Further work is needed to confirm these results and evaluate the relative acceptance of mexiletine vs. other treatments of neuropathic pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.