Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18222627›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain and symptom management2008

Mexiletine therapy for chronic pain: survival analysis identifies factors predicting clinical success.

Ian R Carroll, Kimberly M Kaplan, Sean C Mackey

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effectiveness and safety of mexiletine in patients at risk for (recurrent) ventricular arrhythmias: a systematic review.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Relevance of mexiletine in the era of evolving antiarrhythmic therapy of ventricular arrhythmias.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ian R CarrollStanford Pain Management Center, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA 94304-1573, USA. irc39@pain.stanford.edu
Kimberly M Kaplan
Sean C Mackey
Oregon Health & Science University · USStanford Medicine · USStanford University · US

Funding

Neuroimaging and Mentoring in Translational Pain ResearchK24DA029262 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MACKEY, SEAN C · 2010 to 2019
$1.9M
fMRI of Pain in the Human Spinal CordR01NS053961 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MACKEY, SEAN C · 2006 to 2010
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA029262NINDS NIH HHS NS053961-01NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS053961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mexiletine, a sodium channel blocker, treats neuropathic pain but its clinical value has been questioned due to its significant side effects and limited efficacy. We hypothesized that ongoing therapy with mexiletine would have limited patient acceptance, but that an analgesic response to intravenous (IV) lidocaine (a pharmacologically similar drug) would identify patients most likely to choose ongoing therapy with mexiletine. We identified a cohort of 37 patients with neuropathic pain who underwent IV lidocaine infusions at our institution and were subsequently prescribed mexiletine. Time until discontinuation of mexiletine was used as the primary endpoint. Time until discontinuation is a clinically relevant, discrete, objective endpoint gaining acceptance as a metric for assessing clinical performance of drugs with significant side effects and limited efficacy. We used the techniques of survival analysis to determine factors that predicted continued therapy with mexiletine. Median time to discontinuation of mexiletine was only 43 days. A stronger analgesic response to IV lidocaine significantly predicted continued acceptance of mexiletine therapy. Decreasing age and male gender also predicted continued acceptance of mexiletine therapy. Analyzing time to mexiletine discontinuation uncovers important limitations in mexiletine's clinical performance missed by studies with conventional endpoints, such as change in pain score. Despite claims of efficacy, acceptance of mexiletine therapy is poor overall. Test infusions with lidocaine identify patients most likely to continue mexiletine therapy. Further work is needed to confirm these results and evaluate the relative acceptance of mexiletine vs. other treatments of neuropathic pain.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnesthetics, LocalChoice BehaviorChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLidocaineMaleMexiletineMiddle AgedNeuralgiaPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesAnesthetics, LocalLidocaineMexiletineSodium Channel Blockers

Identifiers

PMID18222627
PMCPMC2925416
OpenAlexW2086394077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.