Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18219780›Full record

ReviewObesity surgery2007

Mineral metabolism and bone disease after bariatric surgery and ways to optimize bone health.

Dave H Schweitzer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Obesity surgery, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bariatric Surgery: Bad to the Bone, Part 1.Integrative medicine (Encinitas, Calif.) · 2016
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dave H SchweitzerDepartment of Internal Medicine and Endocrinology, Reinier de Graaf Groep, Delft-Voorburg, The Netherlands. myradave@xs4all.nl
Reinier de Graaf Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is no consensus on how to protect the skeleton with adequate supplements in patients who have undergone bariatric operations. The main problem in mineral metabolism is usually related to secondary hyperparathyroidism (2 degrees HPT), often caused by a lack of dietary calcium, magnesium or vitamin D, together with changes in intestinal fermentation, transit time, and resorption surfaces left behind after bariatric operations. After primarily restrictive bariatric surgery, adequate mineral metabolism depends mainly on the active metabolite of vitamin D, whereas after primarily malabsorptive surgery, it depends largely on passive resorption by means of the calcium sensitizing receptor (CaSR). Notably, CaSR-activated calcium transport is coupled to the presence of sufficient magnesium. The current review discusses clinically relevant mechanisms of mineral metabolism and provides recommendations for adequate calcium, magnesium, and vitamin D supplementation. Nevertheless, formal supplementation guidelines are needed in the near future.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryBone Density Conservation AgentsBone Diseases, MetabolicCalcium, DietaryHumansHyperparathyroidism, SecondaryObesityVitamin DBone Density Conservation AgentsCalcium, DietaryVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID18219780
OpenAlexW2091215394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.