ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2008
Serum calcium values in term and late-preterm neonates receiving gentamicin.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Renoprotective effects of vitamin D and thymoquinone, alone and in combination, in a rat co-treatment model of gentamicin-induced acute kidney injury.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2026Article
- Serum Vitamin D Deficiency in NICU Hospitalized Neonates and Its Association With Neonatal Outcomes.Journal of family & reproductive health · 2021Article
- Results of a two-center, before and after study of piperacillin-tazobactam versus ampicillin and gentamicin as empiric therapy for suspected sepsis at birth in neonates ≤ 1500 g.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2013Observational
- Renal adaptation to gentamicin-induced mineral loss.American journal of nephrology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since noting an apparent increase in hypocalcemia in neonates receiving gentamicin every 24 h (q 24 h) for > or = 4 days, we have prospectively monitored serum calcium (Ca) values in these patients receiving prolonged gentamicin therapy. This study is a retrospective analysis of those values measured during gentamicin treatment. The study included neonates with gestational age > or = 35 weeks who received > or = 4 days of gentamicin therapy and in whom at least one serum Ca value was measured > or = 47 h after initiation of therapy. Hypocalcemia was defined as a serum Ca level < 8 mg/dl (2 mmol/l). Data were analyzed by Student t-test, chi-square test, and Pearson product moment correlation. There were 1,624 neonates that met the study criteria. Ca was < 8 mg/dl in 241 (15%). Ca < 8 mg/dl was more likely in boys than in girls (16.4% vs 11.8%, P = 0.01) and in neonates < 37 weeks gestational age (GA) than in those > or = 37 weeks GA (23.9% vs 14.1%, P = 0.01). A second Ca value was obtained in 883 neonates (54%); 23.2% of neonates with initial Ca < 8 mg/dl remained hypocalcemic, and 30% of these were receiving oral Ca supplementation. The second Ca value was < 8 mg/dl in eight neonates in whom initial Ca was > or = 8 mg/dl. Hypocalcemia is not uncommon in neonates receiving gentamicin therapy, and it may occur more frequently in boys and late-preterm infants. These data suggest that the monitoring of serum Ca levels should be considered when gentamicin is given > or = 4 days.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.