ArticleInvestigational new drugs2008
Phase I clinical evaluation of ZD6126, a novel vascular-targeting agent, in patients with solid tumors.
Article in Investigational new drugs, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- A Bayesian hierarchical model for DCE-MRI to evaluate treatment response in a phase II study in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2011Trial
- First-in-human phase 1 study of an orally bioavailable vascular-disrupting agent DX1002 in patients with advanced solid tumors.Cell reports. Medicine · 2025Article
- Identification of Novel β-Tubulin Inhibitors Using a CombinedJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2023Article
- A phase 1 dose-escalation and dose-expansion study to assess the safety and efficacy of CKD-516, a novel vascular disrupting agent, in combination with Irinotecan in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer.Investigational new drugs · 2021Article
- Safety and Tolerability of Anti-Angiogenic Protein Kinase Inhibitors and Vascular-Disrupting Agents in Cancer: Focus on Gastrointestinal Malignancies.Drug safety · 2019Review
- Imaging biomarker roadmap for cancer studies.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2017Review
- Novel analogue of colchicine induces selective pro-death autophagy and necrosis in human cancer cells.PloS one · 2014Article
- Phase I, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of CYT997, an orally-bioavailable cytotoxic and vascular-disrupting agent.Investigational new drugs · 2013Article
- Imaging vascular function for early stage clinical trials using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.European radiology · 2012Article
- Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in clinical trials of antivascular therapies.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2012Review
- Discovery of 7-hydroxy-6-methoxy-2-methyl-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoyl)benzo[b]furan (BNC105), a tubulin polymerization inhibitor with potent antiproliferative and tumor vascular disrupting properties.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2011Article
- Cardiovascular toxicity profiles of vascular-disrupting agents.The oncologist · 2011Article
- Microtubule-binding agents: a dynamic field of cancer therapeutics.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2010Review
- A dose escalation, safety, and tolerability study of MN-029 in patients with advanced solid tumors.Investigational new drugs · 2010Article
- Perfusion MRI in the early clinical development of antivascular drugs: decorations or decision making tools?European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2010Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundZD6126 is a novel vascular-targeting agent that disrupts the endothelial tubulin cytoskeleton causing selective occlusion of tumor vasculature and extensive tumor necrosis. This Phase I clinical study was conducted to evaluate the dose and administration schedule of ZD6126.
methodsAdult patients with solid tumors refractory to existing treatments received a 10-min, single-dose intravenous infusion of ZD6126 every 14 or 21 days. Subsequent dose escalation was performed, based on the incidence of adverse events (AEs) within the first cycle of drug administration. Blood samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic analysis, and the effects of ZD6126 on tumor vasculature were visualized using DCE-MRI technology.
resultsForty-four patients received ZD6126 (5-112 mg/m2 in the 21-day schedule, n=35; 40-80 mg/m2 in the 14-day schedule, n=9). Common AEs were similar in both groups and included abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, which appeared to be dose related. The incidence of abdominal pain at 112 mg/m2 in the 21-day study prevented further dose escalation. Pharmacokinetic studies confirmed that ZD6126 is rapidly hydrolyzed to ZD6126 phenol. There was no difference in the pharmacokinetics of ZD6126 phenol upon repeat administration or between the two dosing regimens. DCE-MRI evaluation has demonstrated the antivascular effects of ZD6126.
conclusionsThis study identified that ZD6126 administered every 2 or 3 weeks at 80 mg/m2 was well tolerated, with mild but manageable gastrointestinal AEs. In approximately 11% (5 out of 44) of patients, ZD6126 was associated with cardiac events categorized as dose limiting toxicities (one patient with asymptomatic decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), two with increased troponin concentrations, one with myocardial ischemia, and one with ECG signs of myocardial ischemia).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.