Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18219445›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2008

Phase I clinical evaluation of ZD6126, a novel vascular-targeting agent, in patients with solid tumors.

Patricia M LoRusso, Shirish M Gadgeel, Antoinette Wozniak, Alan J Barge, Helen K Jones, Zachary S DelProposto, Pamela A DeLuca, Jeffrey L Evelhoch, Scott A Boerner, Catherine Wheeler

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Identification of Novel β-Tubulin Inhibitors Using a CombinedJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Imaging biomarker roadmap for cancer studies.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Patricia M LoRussoKarmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, 4100 John R, Mail Code: HW04HO, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. lorussop@karmanos.org
Shirish M Gadgeel
Antoinette Wozniak
Alan J Barge
Helen K Jones
Zachary S DelProposto
Pamela A DeLuca
Jeffrey L Evelhoch
Scott A Boerner
Catherine Wheeler
The Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · USAstraZeneca (Brazil) · BRWayne State University · USAmgen (United States) · USAstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundZD6126 is a novel vascular-targeting agent that disrupts the endothelial tubulin cytoskeleton causing selective occlusion of tumor vasculature and extensive tumor necrosis. This Phase I clinical study was conducted to evaluate the dose and administration schedule of ZD6126.

methodsAdult patients with solid tumors refractory to existing treatments received a 10-min, single-dose intravenous infusion of ZD6126 every 14 or 21 days. Subsequent dose escalation was performed, based on the incidence of adverse events (AEs) within the first cycle of drug administration. Blood samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic analysis, and the effects of ZD6126 on tumor vasculature were visualized using DCE-MRI technology.

resultsForty-four patients received ZD6126 (5-112 mg/m2 in the 21-day schedule, n=35; 40-80 mg/m2 in the 14-day schedule, n=9). Common AEs were similar in both groups and included abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, which appeared to be dose related. The incidence of abdominal pain at 112 mg/m2 in the 21-day study prevented further dose escalation. Pharmacokinetic studies confirmed that ZD6126 is rapidly hydrolyzed to ZD6126 phenol. There was no difference in the pharmacokinetics of ZD6126 phenol upon repeat administration or between the two dosing regimens. DCE-MRI evaluation has demonstrated the antivascular effects of ZD6126.

conclusionsThis study identified that ZD6126 administered every 2 or 3 weeks at 80 mg/m2 was well tolerated, with mild but manageable gastrointestinal AEs. In approximately 11% (5 out of 44) of patients, ZD6126 was associated with cardiac events categorized as dose limiting toxicities (one patient with asymptomatic decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), two with increased troponin concentrations, one with myocardial ischemia, and one with ECG signs of myocardial ischemia).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugEndothelium, VascularFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsOrganophosphorus CompoundsTubulinAntineoplastic AgentsN-acetylcochinol-O-phosphateOrganophosphorus CompoundsTubulin

Identifiers

PMID18219445
OpenAlexW2075180392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.