Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18219289›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2008

The importance of anaemia in diagnosing colorectal cancer: a case-control study using electronic primary care records.

W Hamilton, R Lancashire, D Sharp, T J Peters, K K Cheng, T Marshall

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02792023 (Usefulness of Fecal Immunochemical Test in the Diagnosis Algorithm of Iron Deficiency Anemia.), which is not on this map. Cited by 75 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02792023 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Usefulness of Fecal Immunochemical Test in the Diagnosis Algorithm of Iron Deficiency Anemia.

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Universitario de CanariasRan2016 to 2019Enrolled550ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsImmunochemical fecal occult blood test, Colonoscopy, Upper endoscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Systematic review of clinical features of suspected colorectal cancer in primary care.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2014
    Pooled it
  5. The diagnostic value of symptoms for colorectal cancer in primary care: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Pooled it
  6. Positive predictive values of ≥5% in primary care for cancer: systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Leukaemia diagnosis and primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

W HamiltonAcademic Unit of Primary Health Care, Department of Community Based Medicine, University of Bristol, 25 Belgrave Road, Bristol BS8 2AA, UK. w.hamilton@bristol.ac.uk
R Lancashire
D Sharp
T J Peters
K K Cheng
T Marshall
University of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBAt Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although anaemia is recognised as a feature of colorectal cancer, the precise risk is unknown. We performed a case-control study using electronic primary care records from the Health Improvement Network database, UK. A total of 6442 patients had a diagnosis of colorectal cancer, and were matched to 45 066 controls on age, sex, and practice. We calculated likelihood ratios and positive predictive values for colorectal cancer in both sexes across 1 g dl(-1) haemoglobin and 10-year age bands, and examined the features of iron deficiency. In men, 178 (5.2%) of 3421 cases and 47 (0.2%) of 23,928 controls had a haemoglobin <9.0 g dl(-1), giving a likelihood ratio (95% confidence interval) of 27 (19, 36). In women, the corresponding figures were 227 (7.5%) of 3021 cases and 58 (0.3%) of 21,138 controls, a likelihood ratio of 41 (30, 61). Positive predictive values increased with age and for each 1 g dl(-1) reduction in haemoglobin. The risk of cancer for current referral guidance was quantified. For men over 60 years with a haemoglobin <11 g dl(-1) and features of iron deficiency, the positive predictive value was 13.3% (9.7, 18) and for women with a haemoglobin <10 g dl(-1) and iron deficiency, the positive predictive value was 7.7% (5.7, 11). Current guidance for urgent investigation of anaemia misses some patients with a moderate risk of cancer, particularly men.

Indexed as

Medical Records Systems, ComputerizedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnemiaCase-Control StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsDatabases, FactualElectronic Data ProcessingFemaleHemoglobinsHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsHemoglobins

Identifiers

PMID18219289
PMCPMC2361444
OpenAlexW2155139364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.