ArticleBMC emergency medicine2008
Systematic review of randomized clinical trials on the use of hydroxyethyl starch for fluid management in sepsis.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.
- Randomised trials of 6% tetrastarch (hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 or 0.42) for severe sepsis reporting mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis.Intensive care medicine · 2013Pooled it
- Effect of molecular weight and substitution on tissue uptake of hydroxyethyl starch: a meta-analysis of clinical studies.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2012Pooled it
- Choice of fluids for resuscitation in children with severe infection and shock: systematic review.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2010Pooled it
- Hyperoncotic colloids and acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.Critical care (London, England) · 2010Pooled it
- Trial
- State of the art in fluid and volume therapy : A user-friendly staged concept. English version.Der Anaesthesist · 2019Article
- Association Between Hospital Case Volume of Sepsis, Adherence to Evidence-Based Processes of Care and Patient Outcomes.Critical care medicine · 2017Article
- [State of the art in fluid and volume therapy : A user-friendly staged concept].Der Anaesthesist · 2017Review
- Cryopreservation of dermal fibroblasts and keratinocytes in hydroxyethyl starch-based cryoprotectants.BMC biotechnology · 2016Article
- Hydroxyeyhyl starch: Controversies revisited.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology · 2014Review
- Higher serum chloride concentrations are associated with acute kidney injury in unselected critically ill patients.BMC nephrology · 2013Article
- Role of colloids in traumatic brain injury: Use or not to be used?Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology · 2013Review
- Sepsis: a review for the neurohospitalist.The Neurohospitalist · 2012Article
- Lactate as a hemodynamic marker in the critically ill.Current opinion in critical care · 2012Review
- Consensus statement of the ESICM task force on colloid volume therapy in critically ill patients.Intensive care medicine · 2012Article
- Section 3: Prevention and Treatment of AKI.Kidney international supplements · 2012Article
- [Volume replacement therapy options for critically ill patients].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2011Review
- [Volume replacement in intensive care medicine].Der Anaesthesist · 2011Review
- The impact of crystalloid and colloid infusion on the kidney in rodent sepsis.Intensive care medicine · 2010Article
- Fluids in septic shock: too much of a good thing?Critical care (London, England) · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with sepsis typically require large resuscitation volumes, but the optimal type of fluid remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate current evidence on the effectiveness and safety of hydroxyethyl starch for fluid management in sepsis.
methodsComputer searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were performed using search terms that included hydroxyethyl starch; hetastarch; shock, septic; sepsis; randomized controlled trials; and random allocation. Additional methods were examination of reference lists and hand searching. Randomized clinical trials comparing hydroxyethyl starch with other fluids in patients with sepsis were selected. Data were extracted on numbers of patients randomized, specific indication, fluid regimen, follow-up, endpoints, hydroxyethyl starch volume infused and duration of administration, and major study findings.
resultsTwelve randomized trials involving a total of 1062 patients were included. Ten trials (83%) were acute studies with observation periods of 5 days or less, most frequently assessing cardiorespiratory and hemodynamic variables. Two trials were designed as outcome studies with follow-up for 34 and 90 days, respectively. Hydroxyethyl starch increased the incidence of acute renal failure compared both with gelatin (odds ratio, 2.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-5.83) and crystalloid (odds ratio, 1.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-2.71). In the largest and most recent trial a trend was observed toward increased overall mortality among hydroxyethyl starch recipients (odds ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.95), and mortality was higher (p < 0.001) in patients receiving > 22 mL.kg-1 hydroxyethyl starch per day than lower doses.
conclusionHydroxyethyl starch increases the risk of acute renal failure among patients with sepsis and may also reduce the probability of survival. While the evidence reviewed cannot necessarily be applied to other clinical indications, hydroxyethyl starch should be avoided in sepsis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.