Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18216214›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2008

Selection and validation of a multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis panel for typing Shigella spp.

Olivier Gorgé, Stéphanie Lopez, Valérie Hilaire, Olivier Lisanti, Vincent Ramisse, Gilles Vergnaud

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The evolutionary history ofMicrobial genomics · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Frequency and molecular epidemiology of class A ESBLs producing EnteroinvasiveGastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2020
    Article
  9. Rapid and Simple UniversalApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Subtyping of STEC by MLVA in Argentina.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2012
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Olivier GorgéDepartment of Analytical Microbiology, Centre d'Etudes du Bouchet, BP3, F-91710 Vert-le-Petit, France. olivier.gorge@dga.defense.gouv.fr
Stéphanie Lopez
Valérie Hilaire
Olivier Lisanti
Vincent Ramisse
Gilles Vergnaud

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Shigella genus has historically been separated into four species, based on biochemical assays. The classification within each species relies on serotyping. Recently, genome sequencing and DNA assays, in particular the multilocus sequence typing (MLST) approach, greatly improved the current knowledge of the origin and phylogenetic evolution of Shigella spp. The Shigella and Escherichia genera are now considered to belong to a unique genomospecies. Multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat (VNTR) analysis (MLVA) provides valuable polymorphic markers for genotyping and performing phylogenetic analyses of highly homogeneous bacterial pathogens. Here, we assess the capability of MLVA for Shigella typing. Thirty-two potentially polymorphic VNTRs were selected by analyzing in silico five Shigella genomic sequences and subsequently evaluated. Eventually, a panel of 15 VNTRs was selected (i.e., MLVA15 analysis). MLVA15 analysis of 78 strains or genome sequences of Shigella spp. and 11 strains or genome sequences of Escherichia coli distinguished 83 genotypes. Shigella population cluster analysis gave consistent results compared to MLST. MLVA15 analysis showed capabilities for E. coli typing, providing classification among pathogenic and nonpathogenic E. coli strains included in the study. The resulting data can be queried on our genotyping webpage (http://mlva.u-psud.fr). The MLVA15 assay is rapid, highly discriminatory, and reproducible for Shigella and Escherichia strains, suggesting that it could significantly contribute to epidemiological trace-back analysis of Shigella infections and pathogenic Escherichia outbreaks. Typing was performed on strains obtained mostly from collections. Further studies should include strains of much more diverse origins, including all pathogenic E. coli types.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesDNA, BacterialDysentery, BacillaryGenome, BacterialHumansMinisatellite RepeatsSequence Analysis, DNAShigellaDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID18216214
PMCPMC2268344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.