ArticleFEMS yeast research2008
Dynamics of the yeast transcriptome during wine fermentation reveals a novel fermentation stress response.
Article in FEMS yeast research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 191 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)Autophagy · 2021Guideline
- Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition).Autophagy · 2016Guideline
- Guideline
- Transcriptomic shift in ethanol and amino acid metabolic genes regulated by Med15 during alcoholic fermentation.Microbial genomics · 2026Article
- Multi-omics elucidation of resource allocation for enhanced ethanol production via precise glucose control in anaerobicSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026Article
- Uncorking wine yeast genomics from grape to glass.FEMS yeast research · 2026Review
- Transcriptomic Analysis of the Interaction Between Sake Yeast and Kuratsuki Bacillus in Co-Culture.Current microbiology · 2025Article
- Obtaining new brewing yeasts using regional Chilean wine yeasts through an adaptive evolution program.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Directed evolution as an approach to increase fructose utilization in synthetic grape juice by wine yeast AWRI 796.FEMS yeast research · 2022Article
- Truth in wine yeast.Microbial biotechnology · 2022Review
- Article
- Saccharomyces cerevisiae Gene Expression during Fermentation of Pinot Noir Wines at an Industrially Relevant Scale.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2021Article
- Article
- Genome sequencing, annotation and exploration of the SOBMC genomics · 2021Article
- Possible Role for Allelic Variation in YeastFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Lifestyle, Lineage, and Geographical Origin Influence Temperature-Dependent Phenotypic Variation across Yeast Strains during Wine Fermentation.Microorganisms · 2020Article
- Metabolic Engineering of Wine Strains ofGenes · 2020Review
- Factors affecting yeast ethanol tolerance and fermentation efficiency.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2020Review
- Differential Contribution of the Parental Genomes to aFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, genome-wide expression analyses were used to study the response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to stress throughout a 15-day wine fermentation. Forty per cent of the yeast genome significantly changed expression levels to mediate long-term adaptation to fermenting grape must. Among the genes that changed expression levels, a group of 223 genes was identified, which was designated as fermentation stress response (FSR) genes that were dramatically induced at various points during fermentation. FSR genes sustain high levels of induction up to the final time point and exhibited changes in expression levels ranging from four- to 80-fold. The FSR is novel; 62% of the genes involved have not been implicated in global stress responses and 28% of the FSR genes have no functional annotation. Genes involved in respiratory metabolism and gluconeogenesis were expressed during fermentation despite the presence of high concentrations of glucose. Ethanol, rather than nutrient depletion, seems to be responsible for entry of yeast cells into the stationary phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.