Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18214689›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2007

The epigenetics of mantle cell lymphoma.

Margaret Yu, Elliot Epner

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Margaret YuHuntsman Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Elliot Epner
Oregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is no consensus treatment for newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma. The CHOP + rituximab and hyperCVAD + rituximab regimens are most commonly used. The former is limited by relatively lower rates of complete remission (CR) and frequent relapses. The latter is limited by toxicities, especially in older patients, and relapses that occur later than those usually seen with CHOP + rituximab. Thus, improved therapies are needed. The purine analog cladribine (2-cda) + rituximab has been studied as an alternative frontline regimen in MCL and is quite active with minimal toxicity. Cladribine has epigenetic activity in that it inhibits DNA methylation. Cladribine + rituximab should be further studied in newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma in combination with new agents such as inhibitors of histone deacetylation, the mTOR pathway, and the proteasome.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCladribineCyclophosphamideDexamethasoneDNA MethylationDoxorubicinEpigenesis, GeneticHumansLymphoma, Mantle-CellPrednisoneRituximabVincristineAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedCladribineCyclophosphamideDexamethasoneDoxorubicinPrednisoneRituximabVincristine

Identifiers

PMID18214689
OpenAlexW1993555523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.