Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18214466›Full record

ReviewEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2008

Small angle neutron and X-ray scattering in structural biology: recent examples from the literature.

Cameron Neylon

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Journal of applied crystallography · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Conformational Changes of α-Crystallin Proteins Induced by Heat Stress.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Emerging applications of small angle solution scattering in structural biology.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Cameron NeylonScience and Technology Facilities Council Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot OX 11 0QX, UK. c.neylon@rl.ac.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small angle scattering can provide unique structural information on the shape, domain organisation, and interactions of biomacromolecules in solution. Small angle neutron scattering (SANS) combined with deuterium labelling makes it possible to define the positions of specific components within a complex while small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) provides more precise data on the overall shape. Here I review four recent publications, three of which were presented at the Neutrons in Biology meeting at the STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory in July 2007, that utilise SANS, SAXS, and complementary techniques to define the solution structure of large multidomain proteins and macromolecular complexes. These four papers emphasise the critical importance of sample quality and characterisation as well as the important role played by complementary techniques in building structural models based on small angle scattering data. They show the ability of SANS and SAXS in determining solution structures provides an important complementary structural technique for large, flexible, and glycosylated proteins where high resolution structural techniques, such as crystallography and NMR, cannot be applied.

Indexed as

Molecular BiologyNeutron DiffractionScattering, Small AngleX-Ray DiffractionAnimalsHumansModels, MolecularStatistics as Topic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.