Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18214414›Full record

ArticleDer Nervenarzt2008

[Development of new stroke therapies: outlook for neuroprotective drugs].

A Rogalewski, W-R Schäbitz

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A RogalewskiKlinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum, Albert-Schweitzer-Strasse 33, Münster, Germany. rogalewski@uni-muenster.de
W-R Schäbitz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke remains one of the most urgent medical problems of our times. The failure of most neuroprotective drugs in clinical trials led to the initiation of the Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable guidelines. Due to this improvement, the positive clinical trial results with the free radical scavenger NXY-059 (SAINT I) was encouraging. However, the subsequent SAINT II trial did not confirm these results. In this article we critically review the history of preclinical and clinical trials based on experience of NXY-059 development and present recommendations for potential future preclinical and clinical development of neuroprotective stroke therapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntioxidantsBenzenesulfonatesBrainClinical Trials as TopicDisease Models, AnimalDrug EvaluationErythropoietinGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroprotective AgentsPractice Guidelines as TopicStrokeAntioxidantsBenzenesulfonatesdisufenton sodiumErythropoietinGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorNeuroprotective Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.