Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18212815›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2008

The genetic architecture of fasting plasma triglyceride response to fenofibrate treatment.

Jennifer A Smith, Donna K Arnett, Reagan J Kelly, Jose M Ordovas, Yan V Sun, Paul N Hopkins, James E Hixson, Robert J Straka, James M Peacock, Sharon L R Kardia

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diabetes · 2020
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Fenofibrate and metabolic syndrome.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer A SmithDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA. smjenn@umich.edu
Donna K Arnett
Reagan J Kelly
Jose M Ordovas
Yan V Sun
Paul N Hopkins
James E Hixson
Robert J Straka
James M Peacock
Sharon L R Kardia
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Minnesota · USJean Mayer Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

University of Michigan Training Program in Genomic ScienceT32HG000040 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Sebastian Zoellner · 1995 to 2026
$16.4M
Genetic and Environmental Determinants of TriglyceridesU01HL072524 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI ARNETT, DONNA K · 2002 to 2008
$11.9M
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000040NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG00040NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL072524NHLBI NIH HHS U 01 HL72524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolic response to the triglyceride (TG)-lowering drug, fenofibrate, is shaped by interactions between genetic and environmental factors, yet knowledge regarding the genetic determinants of this response is primarily limited to single-gene effects. Since very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) is the central carrier of fasting TG, identifying factors that affect both total TG and VLDL-TG response to fenofibrate is critical for predicting individual fenofibrate response. As part of the Genetics of Lipid Lowering Drugs and Diet Network (GOLDN) study, 688 individuals from 161 families were genotyped for 91 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 25 genes known to be involved in lipoprotein metabolism. Using generalized estimating equations to control for family structure, we performed linear modeling to investigate whether single SNPs, single covariates, SNP-SNP interactions, and/or SNP-covariate interactions had a significant association with the change in total fasting TG and fasting VLDL-TG after 3 weeks of fenofibrate treatment. A 10-iteration fourfold cross-validation procedure was used to validate significant associations and quantify their predictive abilities. More than one-third of the significant, cross-validated SNP-SNP interactions predicting each outcome involved just five SNPs, showing that these SNPs are of key importance to fenofibrate response. Multiple variable models constructed using the top-ranked SNP--covariate interactions explained 11.9% more variation in the change in TG and 7.8% more variation in the change in VLDL than baseline TG alone. These results yield insight into the complex biology of fenofibrate response, which can be used to target fenofibrate therapy to individuals who are most likely to benefit from the drug.

Indexed as

AdultFastingFemaleFenofibrateHumansHypolipidemic AgentsLipid MetabolismLipoproteins, VLDLMaleMiddle AgedPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReproducibility of ResultsTriglyceridesFenofibrateHypolipidemic AgentsLipoproteins, VLDLTriglyceridesvery low density lipoprotein triglyceride

Identifiers

PMID18212815
PMCPMC2546577
OpenAlexW2057904516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.