Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18212110›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2008

Treatment of scedosporiosis with voriconazole: clinical experience with 107 patients.

Peter Troke, Koldo Aguirrebengoa, Carmen Arteaga, David Ellis, Christopher H Heath, Irja Lutsar, Montserrat Rovira, Quoc Nguyen, Monica Slavin, Sharon C A Chen and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 289 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antifungal therapy in children: an update.European journal of pediatrics · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Destructive Mold Osteomyelitis of the Wrist Caused byJournal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Current medical mycology · 2025
    Article
  14. EarlyIDCases · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Peter TrokeThe Old Court, Broadstairs, Kent CT10 3LW, United Kingdom. peter2troke@btinternet.com
Koldo Aguirrebengoa
Carmen Arteaga
David Ellis
Christopher H Heath
Irja Lutsar
Montserrat Rovira
Quoc Nguyen
Monica Slavin
Sharon C A Chen
Global Scedosporium Study Group
Broadstairs College · GBHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESHospital de Cruces · ESPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUPfizer (United States) · USRoyal Perth Hospital · AUSt Vincent's Hospital Sydney · AUUniversity of Tartu · EEWestmead Hospital · AUWomen's and Children's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy of voriconazole in 107 patients with scedosporiosis was analyzed. Principal infection sites were the lungs/sinuses (24%), central nervous system (CNS) (20%), and bone (18%), while 21% of patients had disseminated infection. Solid organ transplantation (22%), hematological malignancy (21%), and surgery/trauma (15%) were the predominant underlying conditions. A successful therapeutic response was achieved in 57% of patients (median, 103 therapy days), with > 98% of those responding receiving > or = 28 days of therapy. Patients receiving primary therapy showed a 61% response versus 56% for the others. The best therapeutic responses were seen for skin/subcutaneous (91%) or bone (79%) infections, and the lowest for CNS infections (43%). Patients without major immune suppression (72%) or those with solid organ transplantation (63%) or various hematological conditions (60%) showed the best responses by underlying condition. Median known survival time was 133 days (therapy successes, 252 days; failures, 21 days). In all, 43 (40%) patients died, 73% due to scedosporiosis. Patients with Scedosporium prolificans infection had significantly reduced survival times (P = 0.0259) and were more likely to die from fungal infection (P = 0.002) than were Scedosporium apiospermum-infected patients. In a subset of 43 patients where voriconazole baseline MICs were available, response to voriconazole was higher for S. apiospermum-infected patients (54% response; MIC(50), 0.25 microg/ml) than for S. prolificans-infected patients (40% response; MIC(50), 4.0 microg/ml). Voriconazole demonstrated clinically useful activity in the treatment of both S. apiospermum and S. prolificans infections and was well tolerated.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntifungal AgentsAspergillosisChildChild, PreschoolClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHealth SurveysHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedPyrimidinesAntifungal AgentsPyrimidinesTriazolesVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID18212110
PMCPMC2346616
OpenAlexW2077919952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.