Trial reportClinical drug investigation2008
An open-label long-term naturalistic study of mirtazapine treatment for depression in cancer patients.
Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- What is the evidence for mirtazapine in treating cancer-related symptomatology? A systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020Pooled it
- Pharmacotherapeutic Management of Depression in Patients With Cancer: A Review of Mechanistic and Clinical Evidence.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Review
- A systematic review of pharmacologic treatment efficacy for depression in older patients with cancer.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2022Review
- Pharmacological management of depression in patients with cancer: practical considerations.Drugs · 2013Review
- Mirtazapine: a review of its use in major depression and other psychiatric disorders.CNS drugs · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDepression is quite common among cancer patients. It has yet to be determined which antidepressant is the most effective in cancer patients with depression.
methodsThe present study included 21 consecutive depressed oncology patients of whom 19 were followed up for 6 months. All patients initially received mirtazapine 15 mg/day and the dose was increased in the absence of significant treatment response and adverse effects.
resultsDepressive symptoms diminished at the end of month 1 and this improvement was maintained for the remaining 23 weeks of the study. Mean 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) scores fell significantly from 21.4 +/- 4.9 at baseline to 6.5 +/- 3.2 at the end of the first month of treatment (p < 0.001). Among the 19 patients who were followed up, five reported at least one adverse effect during treatment; however, the vast majority of these adverse effects were described as mild to moderate.
conclusionThis prospective, open-label study provides preliminary evidence regarding the efficacy, safety and tolerability of mirtazapine treatment in cancer patients with depression. Relatively low doses of mirtazapine appeared to be safe and effective for treating cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, and the reduction in the severity of depressive symptoms was maintained until the end of the 24-week treatment period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.