Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18211116›Full record

Trial reportClinical drug investigation2008

Formula for use of mannitol in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage and high intracranial pressure.

Ge Tan, Jiying Zhou, Dongli Yuan, Shanquan Sun

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Remote ischemic conditioning for acute stroke patients treated with thrombectomy.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2018
    Article
  4. Treatment of Edema Associated With Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Current treatment options in neurology · 2016
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ge TanDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jiying Zhou
Dongli Yuan
Shanquan Sun
Chongqing Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveAlthough mannitol has been widely used in hospitals to treat patients with high intracranial pressure (ICP) secondary to intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH), no universal agreement has been reached regarding the optimal dosage of this agent for achieving appropriate intracranial decompression. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of different mannitol dosages on ICP and the effects of other factors, such as sex, age, haemorrhage location and haematoma volume, on the ICP-lowering effect of mannitol. The data obtained were then used to construct a formula for estimating the total dosage of mannitol required to reduce ICP in individual patients with ICH. PATIENTS AND

methodsA total of 72 patients with ICH and elevated ICP monitored in our intensive care unit were included in this study. Patients with ICH who had hypoxaemia (arterial oxygen saturation <90%), severe functional disturbances of the liver or kidney, acidosis or pathological changes in the visual conducting pathway were not included in this study. Each patient received 20% intravenous mannitol 125 mL every 4, 6 or 8 hours per day to treat elevated ICP, with ICP levels being measured before administration of mannitol and at least three times per day during administration of the drug. When the ICP reached a fixed level, the dosage of mannitol was gradually reduced. The total dosage of mannitol used to reduce the ICP from the highest value to the fixed value was calculated. Data on the patients' sex, age, haemorrhage location and haematoma volume were also obtained. Multivariate regression analysis of the results enabled development of a formula for use of mannitol in patients with ICH and elevated ICP.

resultsUse of mannitol significantly decreased ICP in all patients. The effect of mannitol on ICP reduction was dose-dependent during the period of ICP reduction (p < 0.05) but not after the ICP had reached a fixed level; this limited effectiveness of mannitol when its dosage reaches a certain level was termed 'mannitol saturation dosage'. The reduction in ICP with mannitol was not statistically significantly affected by the patient's sex or age, but was significantly correlated with both haemorrhage location and haematoma volume (p < 0.05). The reduction in ICP with mannitol was greater in patients with supratentorial ICH compared with those with infratentorial ICH (p < 0.0001).

conclusionThe total mannitol dosage required for individual patients with ICH and elevated ICP can be calculated by considering the location of the haemorrhage, the volume of the haematoma and the pretreated ICP reading. To this end, the following formula was derived in the study: Total dosage of mannitol (mL of 20% mannitol) = (x + 31.17900 x y - 3.39853 x z - 244.47590)/0.00752, where x = the pretreated ICP (mmH(2)O), y = the haemorrhage location (supratentorial ICH: y = 0, infratentorial ICH: y = 1) and z = the volume of haematoma (mL). Use of this formula in the clinical setting should help reduce the possibility of adverse effects resulting from administration of excessive dosages of mannitol.

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsCerebral HemorrhageClinical ProtocolsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansInjections, IntravenousIntensive Care UnitsIntracranial HypertensionLeast-Squares AnalysisMaleMannitolMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisMannitol

Identifiers

PMID18211116
OpenAlexW2018527225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.