Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18210151›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2008

Clinical significance of osteopontin expression in cervical cancer.

HanByoul Cho, Soon Won Hong, Youn Jin Oh, Min A Kim, Eun Suk Kang, Jong Min Lee, Sang Wun Kim, Sung Hoon Kim, Jae Hoon Kim, Young Tae Kim and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Is Osteopontin a Reliable Biomarker for Endometriosis?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. OPN -Revisited.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2015
    Review
  18. Aberrant expression of osteopontin and E-cadherin indicates radiation resistance and poor prognosis for patients with cervical carcinoma.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

HanByoul ChoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yongdong Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 146-92 Dogok-Dong Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 135-720, South Korea.
Soon Won Hong
Youn Jin Oh
Min A Kim
Eun Suk Kang
Jong Min Lee
Sang Wun Kim
Sung Hoon Kim
Jae Hoon Kim
Young Tae Kim
Kook Lee
Yonsei University · KRSeverance Hospital · KRKyung Hee University East-West Neo Medical Center · KRSamsung Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNew diagnostic markers, other than squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) antigen, are needed for the detection of cervical cancer. Osteopontin (OPN) is a candidate frequently associated with several human malignancies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of OPN expression as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for cervical cancer.

methodsImmunohistochemical staining of tissue from 97 cervical cancer cases and 22 healthy subjects was performed in order to determine the source of elevated plasma OPN levels. In addition, plasma OPN levels of 81 patients with cervical cancer, 34 patients with carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the uterine cervix, and those of 283 healthy women were measured with a commercially available solid-phase sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The correlation between OPN levels and clinical features were examined and compared to SCC antigen levels in the cervical cancer cases.

resultsImmunohistochemical staining revealed OPN immunoreactivity in 67.0% (65/97) of cervical cancer tissues, and the immunostaining score in the cervical cancer tissue sections was 2.06 (95% CI, 1.70-2.42). There was no significant difference in immunostaining scores based on age, tumor size, and tumor stage, but higher scores (3.0< score <or=6.0) were significantly correlated with overall survival (P = 0.002) and disease-free survival (P = 0.033). Plasma OPN levels in women with cervical cancer (mean 355.8 ng/ml) were significantly higher (P < 0.001) than those of women with CIS (mean: 185 ng/ml) and healthy controls (mean 100 ng/ml). Within the cervical cancer patients, OPN levels correlated with increasing tumor size (P = 0.008) and tumor stage (P < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of OPN in detecting cervical cancer was 50.6 and 95.0%, respectively (cutoff value 215.5 ng/ml). Using a combination of markers proved to bring more sensitive results than using one marker (sensitivity: 65.4%, specificity: 90.9%). High plasma OPN levels (>215.5 ng/ml) were also correlated with disease-free survival (P = 0.038).

conclusionsThese results suggest that plasma OPN levels are potentially useful as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for cervical cancer.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorDisease-Free SurvivalEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedOsteopontinPrognosisSensitivity and SpecificityUterine Cervical NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorOsteopontin

Identifiers

PMID18210151
PMCPMC12160727
OpenAlexW2080778961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.