Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18210072›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2008

[Contemporary medical management of the benign prostatic syndrome].

S Madersbacher, M C Michel, K Dreikorn

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

S MadersbacherAbteilung für Urologie und Andrologie, Donauspital - SMZO, 1220, Wien, Osterreich. stephan.madersbacher@wienkav.at
M C Michel
K Dreikorn
Academic Medical Center · NLDonauspital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two groups of drugs, alpha blockers and 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (5ARI), are currently widely used for the medical treatment of benign prostatic syndrome (BPS). Alpha blockers are characterized by a rapid onset of efficacy. If given at an adequate dose, all alpha blockers have a similar efficacy, yet quantitative differences regarding side effects exist. The onset of clinical efficacy of 5ARIs is delayed and dependent on prostate volume. Symptom improvement is generally less pronounced than with alpha blockers, yet this difference declines with time. 5ARI, in contrast to alpha blockers, reduce prostate volume and the risk of long-term BPS complications such as prostate surgery or acute urinary retention. The combination therapy of alpha blockers and 5ARI is superior to either monotherapy; however, this superiority becomes evident only after prolonged (>1 year) therapy. Because of additive side effects, this combination should be reserved for BPS patients with a high risk of progression. Regarding plant extracts, no definitive recommendation can be given because of a limited number of high-quality clinical trials. The use of antimuscarinics in men with BPS with a dominance of storage symptoms and without significant obstruction is promising, although further trials, particularly with a longer study duration, are required.

Indexed as

5-alpha Reductase InhibitorsAdrenergic alpha-AntagonistsHumansMaleMuscarinic AntagonistsProstatic HyperplasiaSyndromeUrology5-alpha Reductase InhibitorsAdrenergic alpha-AntagonistsMuscarinic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID18210072
OpenAlexW2346626647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.