Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18210004›Full record

ReviewHNO2008

[Update on physiology and pathophysiology of the inner ear: pathomechanisms of sensorineural hearing loss].

N Strenzke, D Pauli-Magnus, A Meyer, A Brandt, H Maier, T Moser

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in HNO, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Molecular biology of hearing.GMS current topics in otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery · 2011
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

N StrenzkeEaton Peabody Laboratory, MEEI, Harvard University, Boston, USA.
D Pauli-Magnus
A Meyer
A Brandt
H Maier
T Moser
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEHarvard University Press · USUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hearing impairment is the most common form of human sensory deficit. The most frequent form, sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), which accounts for approximately 70% of cases, encompasses various pathologies in both the inner ear and the auditory nerve. The individual hearing impairment and its outcome following aiding with hearing devices critically depend on the underlying disorder. Here recent progress in our understanding of the cellular mechanisms of SNHL in genetically engineered mouse models is reviewed. First, insights gained from models for specific defects in cochlear sound amplification and ion homeostasis are discussed followed by a focus on disorders of the inner hair cell synapses (auditory synaptopathy) and the auditory nerve (auditory neuropathy). Both nosological entities have also attracted substantial clinical interest in recent years and share an impaired temporal processing of auditory stimuli. This results in poor speech recognition, often out of proportion to the pure tone threshold. Hearing loss can range from mild variants with exclusive deficits of temporal processing to complete deafness. At least initially, signs of normal outer hair cell function such as evoked otoacoustic emissions can be found. In summary, well-characterized animal models allow us to refine our pathophysiological understanding of SNHL and offer invaluable help in defining toolboxes for investigating the mechanism(s) underlying the SNHL of affected individuals. Together, this will contribute to custom-tailored diagnostics and rehabilitation of SNHL patients.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalModels, BiologicalAnimalsEar, InnerHearing Loss, SensorineuralHumans

Identifiers

PMID18210004
OpenAlexW1606910196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.